Estimating Methane Fugitive Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Systems in China

被引:0
|
作者
Chen C.-C. [1 ,2 ]
Lü Y.-L. [1 ,3 ]
He G.-Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
[3] State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Coast and Wetland Ecosystems, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2022年 / 43卷 / 11期
关键词
climate change; fugitive emissions; methane emission inventory; methane emissions; oil and gas system;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202204176
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To achieve its carbon peaking and carbon neutrality objectives, China is committed to promoting a decarbonized energy transition, which has strengthened the shift from coal to oil and gas resources. As a result, methane (CH4) fugitive emissions from China’s oil and gas systems are of increasing concern. Fugitive emissions include equipment leaks, venting, and flaring and involve exploration, production, transportation, storage, and distribution of oil and gas resources. However, there is no uniform accounting method for methane fugitive emissions from oil and gas systems, and fugitive emissions have not been included in the national greenhouse gas inventory statistics. Using the relevant methods, methane fugitive emissions from China’s oil and gas systems were estimated for the period from 1980-2020. The results showed that CH4 fugitive emissions from oil and gas systems increased rapidly with the growth of production and consumption of oil and gas resources, from less than 0.6 million tons in 1980 to more than 2.6 million tons in 2020. CH4 fugitive emissions from oil and gas systems reached approximately 0.6 million tons and 2.0 million tons, which were 1.38 and 16.6 times larger than those in 1980, respectively. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas systems originated primarily from gas production, oil production, gas transportation, and storage, accounting for 41%, 20%, 18%, and 13% of total emissions, respectively. Gas pipelines were the main fugitive facilities. The emission intensity of unconventional oil and gas resource exploration was higher compared to conventional resource exploration. This study improved the CH4 fugitive emission inventory, which could provide solid scientific data for CH4 reduction. © 2022 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4905 / 4913
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Hmiel B, Petrenko V V, Dyonisius M N, Et al., Preindustrial <sup>14</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, Nature, 578, 7795, pp. 409-412, (2020)
  • [2] Floerchinger C, McKain K, Bonin T, Et al., Methane emissions from oil and gas production on the North Slope of Alaska, Atmospheric Environment, 218, (2019)
  • [3] Zhang Y Z, Gautam R, Pandey S, Et al., Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space[J], Science Advances, 6, 17, (2020)
  • [4] Jackson R B, Saunois M, Bousquet P, Et al., Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources [J], Environmental Research Letters, 15, 7, (2020)
  • [5] Brereton C A, Johnson M R., Identifying sources of fugitive emissions in industrial facilities using trajectory statistical methods, Atmospheric Environment, 51, pp. 46-55, (2012)
  • [6] Yusuf R O, Noor Z Z, Abba A H, Et al., Methane emission by sectors: a comprehensive review of emission sources and mitigation methods, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 7, pp. 5059-5070, (2012)
  • [7] Bousquet P, Ciais P, Miller J B, Et al., Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443, 7110, pp. 439-443, (2006)
  • [8] West J J, Fiore A M, Horowitz L W, Et al., Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 11, pp. 3988-3993, (2006)
  • [9] Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin K V, Et al., Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1. 5°C, Nature Climate Change, 8, 4, pp. 325-332, (2018)
  • [10] Saunois M, Stavert A R, Poulter B, Et al., The global methane budget 2000 - 2017[J], Earth System Science Data, 12, 3, pp. 1561-1623, (2020)