Comparison of ground motion selection in seismic design codes between China and United States

被引：0
|
作者：
Xu Z. [1 ,2 ]
Wen R. [1 ,2 ]
Ren Y. [1 ,2 ]
Ji K. [1 ,2 ]
Wang H. [1 ,2 ]
Xu P. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin
[2] Key Lab of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin
来源：
Wen, Ruizhi (ruizhi@iem.ac.cn) | 1600年 / Harbin Institute of Technology卷 / 52期
关键词：
American code; Chinese code; Ground motion selection; Record amplitude scaling; Spectral matching;
D O I：
10.11918/202001083
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to study the differences in ground motion selection schemes at home and abroad, code for seismic design of buildings (GB 50011—2010) and minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16) were taken as examples, and the corresponding selection results were compared. Through the conversion of design spectrum parameters, ground motion records were selected at the same seismic fortification level under two working conditions according to the methods in two codes, which were then used as dynamic time history input for 4-story and 12-story concrete frame structures to compare the story displacement angle and story shear force. Results show that the selection and amplitude scaling based on a single direction according to the Chinese seismic code may result in a low matching degree in the other direction and a large dispersion of the calculation results. The American seismic code adopts the maximum direction spectrum, which has clearer physical meaning. In addition, the Chinese code only specifies the relative error of the recorded response spectrum, while the American code specifies the lower limit of the spectrum. Although the Chinese code avoids the conservativeness of the results, it may lead to significant disparities between one or more records and the target spectrum, which may cause the dispersion of the results to be uncontrollable. Hence, it is suggested to combine the advantages of the two methods to control the relative error and the lower error limit. Copyright ©2020 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology.All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：61 / 70
页数：9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] WEN Ruizhi, JI Kun, REN Yefei, Review on selection of strong ground motion input for structure time-history dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 39, 5, (2019)
  • [2] Code for seismic design of buildings: GB 50011—2010, (2010)
  • [3] JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, Ground motion recordings selection for seismic design code, Journal of Building Structures, 38, 12, (2017)
  • [4] YANG Pu, LI Yingmin, LAI Ming, A new method for selecting input waves for time-history analysis, China Civil Engineering Journal, 33, 6, (2000)
  • [5] CHEN Bo, WEN Zengping, Optimized real ground motion selection and scaling method considering uncertainty and spectral shape of target spectrum, Journal of Building Structures, 36, 11, (2015)
  • [6] LI Shuang, ZHOU Hongyuan, LIU Xiangyang, Et al., Study on near-fault seismic design spectra based on Chinese code for seismic design of buildings, Journal of Building Structures, 41, 2, (2020)
  • [7] LV Dagang, LIU Tingting, LI Siyu, Et al., Investigation of effects of target spectrum and amplitude scaling methods on selection of ground motion, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 38, 4, (2018)
  • [8] Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures: ASCE/SEI 7-16, (2016)
  • [9] JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei, Study on the initial of selection criteria strong motion records for Chinese seismic code, Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 36, 1, (2016)
  • [10] JI Kun, Strong ground motion selection for multiple levels of seismic fortification demand in China, (2018)
12