Research on Frequency Compatibility of Collaboration-Based Large-Scale NGSO Constellations

被引：0
|
作者：
Li W. [1 ]
Pan J. [1 ]
Yan K. [1 ]
Wei W.-K. [1 ]
Zhang L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] The State Radio Monitoring Center, Beijing
来源：
Beijing Youdian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications | 2020年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词：
Frequency compatibility; Interference analysis; Large-scale non-geostationary orbit communication constellations; Non-cooperative/cooperative mode; System availability;
D O I：
10.13190/j.jbupt.2020-189
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Aiming at the problem of co-frequency interference between large-scale non-geostationary orbit(NGSO)constellation systems, we established the interference analysis model of link angle to convert communication interference constraints into geometric configuration constraints based on the comprehensive analysis of the mutual conversion relationship of the traditional interference evaluation indicators. Furthermore, the system availability index is defined by satellite selection and link combination selection. On basis of this, we carry out some researches on frequency compatibility of collaboration-based large-scale NGSO constellations, in which the working mode of NGSO constellation in cooperation mode is given. In this simulation, the actual working parameters of OneWeb and Telesat systems are selected to evaluate the system availability on a global scale. The result illustrates that the average system availability in non-cooperative mode is 72.82% since the severe interference will occur between systems in 27.18% of the time, while the average system availability in cooperative mode is 96.00%, which means cooperation mode will greatly improve the compatibility of NGSO communication constellation systems. © 2020, Editorial Department of Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：110 / 117
页数：7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Portillo I, Cameron B G, Crawley E F., Ground segment architectures for large LEO constellations with feeder links in EHF-bands, IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1-14, (2018)
  • [2] Portillo I, Cameron B G, Crawley E F., A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband, Acta Astronautica, 159, pp. 123-135, (2019)
  • [3] Park C S, Kang C G, Choi Y S, Et al., Interference analysis of geostationary satellite networks in the presence of moving non-geostationary satellites, Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Information Technology Convergence and Services, pp. 1-5, (2010)
  • [4] Sharma S K, Chatzinotas S, Ottersten B., In-line interference mitigation techniques for spectral coexistence of GEO and NGEO satellites, International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 34, 1, pp. 11-39, (2016)
  • [5] Wang Huiwen, Wang Cheng, Yuan Jun, Et al., Coexistence downlink interference analysis between LEO system and GEO system in Ka band, IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 465-469, (2018)
  • [6] Pourmoghadas A, Sharma S K, Chatzinotas S, Et al., On the spectral coexistence of GSO and NGSO FSS systems: power control mechanisms and a methodology for inter-site distance determination, International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 35, 5, pp. 443-459, (2016)
  • [7] Wang Yunfeng, Ding Xiaojin, Zhang Genxin, A novel dynamic spectrum-sharing method for GEO and LEO satellite networks, IEEE Access, 8, pp. 147895-147906, (2020)
  • [8] Wang Chuang, Bian Dongming, Shi Shengchao, Et al., A novel cognitive satellite network with GEO and LEO broadband systems in the downlink case, IEEE Access, 6, pp. 25987-26000, (2018)
  • [9] Panagopoulos A D, Arapoglou P M, Chatzarakis G E, Et al., Coexistence of the broadcasting satellite service with fixed service systems in frequency bands above 10 GHz, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 52, 1, pp. 100-107, (2006)
  • [10] Electronic code of federal regulations CFR 25.261: sharing among NGSO FSS space stations
12