Hyperspectral remote sensing imagery classification based on elastic net and low-rank representation

被引:0
|
作者
Su H. [1 ]
Yao W. [1 ]
Wu Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ENLRR; hyperspectral remote sensing; image classification; KENLRR; low-rank representation;
D O I
10.11834/jrs.20210209
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, Low-Rank Representation (LRR) has been widely used in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery classification. How to accurately classify ground objects by LRR has become a challenge in hyperspectral remote sensing research. The LRR based on elastic net (ENLRR) and the extended kernel version of ENLRR (KENLRR) are proposed to solve the above-mentioned problem. LRR classification method can make full use of the global information of the image. Its basic idea is to represent the whole test image by using the linear combination of as few training samples as possible, reconstructing the target image according to the representation coefficient matrix and training samples, and calculating the class of each pixel by the minimum reconstruction error criterion. The main idea of ENLRR is to introduce an elastic net into the LRR model, which replaces the rank function with the combination of nuclear and Frobenius norms of the coefficient matrix. To better classify nonlinear data, a modified KENLRR method is proposed by introducing kernel tricks in the ENLRR algorithm, and the neighborhood filter kernel function is adopted to map the original data into a high-dimensional feature space, which can obtain spatial-spectral joint information for better classification. In the experiments, three popular hyperspectral datasets are adopted, the proposed methods and the SVM, KNN, ELM, LRR, MFLRR, LSLRR, and KLRR comparison methods are used to carry out classification. Based on the experimental results, the proposed methods are effective in accurately distinguishing ground objects and have good stability and adaptability. In comparison with LRR method, the overall classification accuracies of ENLRR and KENLRR are improved by 4.55% and 6.74% in the Washington DC dataset, 14.22% and 23.30% in the Purdue Campus dataset, and 8.45% and 15.40% in the Gaofen-5 (GF-5) Yellow River Delta dataset. Therefore, the KENLRR method can provide the best performance for hyperspectral remote sensing imagery classification. The high-quality classification results provide technical support for analyzing the distribution pattern of ground objects, and prove the superiority of the proposed methods in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery classification. © 2022 National Remote Sensing Bulletin. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2354 / 2368
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Altman N S., An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression, The American Statistician, 46, 3, pp. 175-185, (1992)
  • [2] Baudat G, Anouar F., Generalized discriminant analysis using a kernel approach, Neural Computation, 12, 10, pp. 2385-2404, (2000)
  • [3] Chen C F, Wei C P, Wang Y C F., Low-rank matrix recovery with structural incoherence for robust face recognition, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2618-2625, (2012)
  • [4] Cui B G, Cui J D, Lu Y, Guo N N, Gong M G., A sparse representation-based sample pseudo-labeling method for hyperspectral image classification, Remote Sensing, 12, 4, (2020)
  • [5] Deng W, Yin W T., On the global and linear convergence of the generalized alternating direction method of multipliers, Journal of Scientific Computing, 66, 3, pp. 889-916, (2016)
  • [6] Du P J, Xia J S, Xue Z H, Tan K, Su H J, Bao R., Review of hyperspectral remote sensing image classification, National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 20, 2, pp. 236-256, (2016)
  • [7] Huang G B, Zhu Q Y, Siew C K., Extreme learning machine: theory and applications, Neurocomputing, 70, pp. 489-501, (2006)
  • [8] Huang X, Zhang L P., An adaptive mean-shift analysis approach for object extraction and classification from urban hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46, 12, pp. 4173-4185, (2008)
  • [9] Jia S, Shen L L, Li Q Q., Gabor feature-based collaborative representation for hyperspectral imagery classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53, 2, pp. 1118-1129, (2015)
  • [10] Jiao L L, Sun W W, Yang G, Ren G B, Liu Y N., A hierarchical classification framework of satellite multispectral/hyperspectral images for mapping coastal wetlands, Remote Sensing, 11, 19, (2019)