Design and evaluation of green taxiing strategy for departure aircraft during peak hours

被引：0
|
作者：
Zheng L. [1 ]
Hu R. [1 ]
Zhang J. [1 ]
Zhu J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
来源：
Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics | 2019年 / 45卷 / 11期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Air transportation; Green taxiing strategy; Pollutant emissions; Speed optimization; Stand holding;
D O I：
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0124
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to effectively reduce the congestion delay and pollutant emissions of departure aircraft during peak hours in large hub airports, the design and evaluation of different taxiing strategies are carried out. Firstly, the calculation model of departure aircraft taxiing cost including environmental cost is established. Then, three different departure aircraft green taxiing strategies are proposed: punctual pushback, stand holding and speed optimization. Finally, targeting the minimum total taxiing cost, the genetic algorithm is used to carry out example simulation, to solve the optimal taxiing route under different strategies, and to compare and analyze the effectiveness of different taxiing strategies on congestion mitigation and emission reduction. The results show that, compared with the punctual pushback strategy, the stand holding and speed optimization strategy can reduce the total taxiing time by 5.90% and 22.49%, and has good congestion mitigation effect. In addition, the stand holding strategy has the lowest fuel consumption and emission cost, and the speed optimization strategy has the lowest pollutant emissions, so both of them have certain emission reduction effect. © 2019, Editorial Board of JBUAA. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2320 / 2326
页数：6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Carr F.R., Stochastic modeling and control of airport surface traffic, (2001)
  • [2] Atkin J.A., Burke E.K., Greenwood J.S., A comparison of two methods for reducing take-off delay at London Heathrow airport, Journal of Scheduling, 14, 5, pp. 409-421, (2011)
  • [3] Ravizza S., Atkin J.A.D., Burke E.K., A more realistic approach for airport ground movement optimization with stand holding, Journal of Scheduling, 17, 5, pp. 507-520, (2014)
  • [4] Zhao X.L., Tang J.X., Lu F., Strategy analysis for delayed fights pushback and sensitivity analysis of the length of virtual queue, Journal of Sichuan University(Engineering Science Edition), 48, 3, pp. 115-123, (2016)
  • [5] Chen J., Weiszer M., Stewart P., Optimal speed profile generation for airport ground movement with consideration of emissions, 18th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1797-1802, (2015)
  • [6] Nikoleris T., Gupta G., Kistler M., Detailed estimation of fuel consumption and emissions during aircraft taxi operations at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Transport Research Part D: Transport & Environment, 16, 4, pp. 302-308, (2011)
  • [7] Evertse C., A low emissions taxi movement planning tool, (2014)
  • [8] Chen J., Weiszer M., Stewart P., Et al., Toward a more realistic, cost-effective and greener ground movement through active routing-part I: Optimal speed profile generation, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17, 5, pp. 1196-1209, (2016)
  • [9] Chen L., Hu R., Zheng L.J., Et al., Study on the cost of flight delays during the taxi-out and waiting period with the consideration of environmental cost, Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 36, 2, pp. 28-32, (2018)
  • [10] Simaiakis I., Balakrishnan H., Khadilkar H., Et al., Demonstration of reduced airport congestion through pushback rate control, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 66, 1, pp. 251-267, (2014)
12