Evaluating Student Engagement with Deep Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Wang N. [1 ,2 ]
Wang Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun
[2] Business Big Data Research Center of Jilin Province, Changchun
关键词
Deep Learning; Engagement Evaluation; Face Recognition;
D O I
10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0485
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Objective] This paper constructs an expression data set of engagement degrees and designs a joint evaluation model for students’class engagement. It addresses the issues of lacking relevant expression data sets and the low accuracy of the existing models. [Methods] We collected data based on actual online classes and constructed an expression dataset suitable for engagement recognition. Then, we designed an improved VGG model to evaluate the dataset and recognize student engagement. Third, we combined the expression and face scores to establish a joint evaluation model for students’engagement and calculated the tested students’actual class engagement scores. [Results] We adjusted and verified the network structure through parameter tuning optimization for engagement expression recognition. The improved model VGG16+Dense+Dropout(lr=1e-5) had the highest accuracy among the four compared model architectures, reaching over 92%. The joint engagement score is more accurate for engagement evaluation than the single expression engagement score. [Limitations] We did not include more ablation studies in training the model; more research is needed to explore the deeper neural networks. [Conclusions] The dataset of W-AttLe is suitable for evaluating students’class engagement. The proposed joint engagement evaluation model outperforms the single index model. The proposed weighted test scheme combining knowledge point test and self-test of comprehension degree validates the joint engagement degree model. © 2023 Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 133
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Howard W R., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Kybernetes, 36, 2, (2007)
  • [2] LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G., Deep Learning, Nature, 521, 7553, pp. 436-444, (2015)
  • [3] Coan J A, Allen J J B., Frontal EEG Asymmetry as a Moderator and Mediator of Emotion[J], Biological Psychology, 67, 1-2, pp. 7-50, (2004)
  • [4] Day M., Exploiting Facial Landmarks for Emotion Recognition in the Wild
  • [5] LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Et al., Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 11, pp. 2278-2324, (1998)
  • [6] Dinesh D, Bijlani K, Student Analytics for Productive Teaching/Learning, Proceedings of International Conference on Information Science, pp. 97-102, (2017)
  • [7] Butko N J, Theocharous G, Philipose M, Et al., Automated Facial Affect Analysis for One-on-One Tutoring Applications, Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, pp. 382-387, (2011)
  • [8] Hedges J H, Adolph K E, Amso D, Et al., Play, Attention, and Learning: How Do Play and Timing Shape the Development of Attention and Influence Classroom Learning?, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1292, 1, pp. 1-20, (2013)
  • [9] Smith L B, Colunga E, Yoshida H., Knowledge as Process: Contextually Cued Attention and Early Word Learning, Cognitive Science, 34, 7, pp. 1287-1314, (2010)
  • [10] Steinmayr R, Ziegler M, Trauble B., Do Intelligence and Sustained Attention Interact in Predicting Academic Achievement?[J], Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 1, pp. 14-18, (2010)