Design and optimization of ultra-low NOx emission for S-CO2 pulverized coal-fired boiler

被引:0
|
作者
Chen M. [1 ]
Zhong W. [1 ]
Chen X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing
关键词
Denitrification; Numerical simulation; Orthogonal experiment; S-CO[!sub]2[!/sub] coal-fired boiler; Selective catalytic reduction;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2022.01.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To achieve the ultra-low NOx emission of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) Brayton circulating coal-fired power generation, the thermal system analysis and combustion numerical test of a 1 000 MW S-CO2 circulating pulverized coal boiler were carried out to obtain the temperature distribution in the tail flue and the characteristics of flue gas at the furnace outlet. Based on this, a design scheme for ultra-low NOx emission was constructed. The influence rule of structure parameters on the denitrification performance was studied by combining numerical simulation with orthogonal experiment, and the internal structure of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitrification system was optimized. The results show that the outlet temperature of S-CO2 pulverized coal boiler is higher than that of the traditional steam boiler. The air preheater of S-CO2 pulverized coal boiler needs to be divided into two stages and the SCR denitrification reactor should be placed between the two stages. The heat absorption capacity of the air preheater in front of SCR denitrification reactor is 215.83 MW. The upstream structure of the catalyst has the greatest influence on the inlet speed deviation of the catalytic layer. The relative standard deviation coefficient of the first catalyst inlet of the optimized denitrification system is 10.19%. © 2022, Editorial Department of Journal of Southeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Deng Q H, Hu L H, Li J, Et al., State-of-art and tendency on technologies of large electric power generation, Thermal Turbine, 48, 3, pp. 175-181, (2019)
  • [2] Feher E G., The supercritical thermodynamic power cycle, Energy Conversion, 8, 2, pp. 85-90, (1968)
  • [3] Mecheri M, Le Moullec Y., Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants, Energy, 103, pp. 758-771, (2016)
  • [4] Park S, Kim J, Yoon M, Et al., Thermodynamic and economic investigation of coal-fired power plant combined with various supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Brayton power cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering, 130, pp. 611-623, (2018)
  • [5] Angelino G., Carbon dioxide condensation cycles for power production, Journal of Engineering for Power, 90, 3, pp. 287-295, (1968)
  • [6] Ahn Y, Bae S J, Kim M, Et al., Review of supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> power cycle technology and current status of research and development, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 47, 6, pp. 647-661, (2015)
  • [7] Wang X H, Liu Q B, Bai Z, Et al., Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> system with solar energy and biomass, Applied Energy, 227, pp. 108-118, (2018)
  • [8] Deng Q H, Hu L H, Li J, Et al., State-of-art and challenge on technologies of supercritical carbon dioxide electric power generation, Thermal Turbine, 48, 3, pp. 159-165, (2019)
  • [9] Mondal S, De S., CO<sub>2</sub> based power cycle with multi-stage compression and intercooling for low temperature waste heat recovery, Energy, 90, pp. 1132-1143, (2015)
  • [10] Xu T T, Zhao H X, Han J T, Et al., Influence of structural and operating condition parameters on performance of printed circuit heat exchanger, Thermal Power Generation, 49, 12, pp. 28-35, (2020)