Quantitative analysis of coal mining disturbance on environment in Xinjiang Gobi Open-pit mining area

被引:0
|
作者
Liu Y. [1 ,3 ]
Xu P. [1 ]
Bi Y. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yue H. [1 ,3 ]
Peng S. [4 ]
Han Y. [5 ]
Jiang K. [5 ]
机构
[1] College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an
[2] College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an
[3] Institute of Ecological Environment Restoration in Mine Areas of West China, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an
[4] State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Safety Mining, China University of Mining Technology-Beijing, Beijing
[5] Guoneng Xinjiang Hongshaquan Energy Co.,Ltd., Urumqi
来源
关键词
arid coal mine ecological index; coal dust index; mining activities; random forest; sparrow search algorithm;
D O I
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.XH22.1629
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ecological environment in Xinjiang Gobi open-pit mining area is fragile and easily affected by natural and man-made factors. Therefore,the ecological environment in Xinjiang mining area has been paid more attention. Taking Wucaiwan open-pit mining area in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region as study area,coal dust index,salinity index and land degradation index were introduced to construct arid coal mine ecological index (IACME) based on the remote sensing ecological index (IRSE) and Landsat images from 1990 to 2020. M-K test and Sen trend analysis were used to reveal the spatial and temporal evolution of IACME in the study area,which evaluated the eco-environmental quality of arid mining area. Multiple regression,neural network,random forest and support vector machine methods were employed to establish the relationship between climate factors and IACME since mining and the prediction of IACME ′ based on only climatic conditions was obtained. The influence of mining activity was quantitatively assessed by the residual analysis and difference-in-difference method. The results showed that:① The average IACME of the study area was 0.28 during the past 30 years,indicating the quality of ecological environment was poor. The IACME of study area showed a decreasing trend from 1990 (0.30) to 2020 (0.22). The percentage of degraded area was 62.63%, which was much higher than that of improved area (28.3%). Due to the influence of mining activities,the percentage of significantly degraded area increased by 12.96%,mainly located in the outward radiation area around the mine. The proportion of significantly improved area decreased by 17.28%.② The relationship model between climate factors and IACME was established using multiple regression,neural network,random forest and support vector machine methods in Wucaiwan mining area. The results indicated that the random forest of sparrow search algorithm (SSA-RF) had the highest precision in modeling with R2 being 0.82 and ERMS being 0.109 in verification set. SSA-RF had higher reliability and stronger applicability among modeling methods used. ③ SSA-RF was adopted to predict Quantitative analysis I′ACME based on climatic conditions. The ecological environment of the study area was mainly in poor (0.2-0.4) and medium (0.4-0.6) levels. Assuming no mining activity,the average value of I′ACME in the study area ranged from 0.26 to 0.59 during 2006-2020, and the average value of IACME ′ was about 0.40,which was significantly higher than IACME in the same year,mainly concentrated in the middle of the study area where the mines was located.④ The residual analysis demonstrated that mining activities in the study area had a negative impact on the ecological environment with an average residual (δ) of -0.116. The results of difference-in-difference method showed that the negative value was -0.112, which further indicated that coal mining had a negative impact on the ecological environment,leading to a decline in the quality of the ecological environment. The results of these two methods were similar,indicating that SSA-RF and difference-in-difference method all can be used to quantitatively analyze the impact of coal mining. ⑤ The proportion of ecological environment degradation and improvement caused by mining activities was 57.52% and 34.67%,respectively. While the proportion of ecological environment degradation and improvement caused by climatic conditions was 42.28% and 65.33%,respectively. The proportion of ecological environmental degradation caused by mining was more than 50%,indicating that mining activity was one of the important factors affecting ecological degradation. The ecological environment of Wucaiwan mining area needs to be restored urgently. Manual intervention should be supplemented to promote the environmental protection, ecosystem restoration and comprehensive management in the study area. © 2023 China Coal Society. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:959 / 974
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Technical criterion for ecosystem status evaluation:HJ 192-2015, (2015)
  • [2] XU Hanqiu, A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application [J], Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 24, pp. 7853-7862, (2013)
  • [3] ZHOU Shi, LI Hongyi, Application of artificial neural network approach and remotely sensed imagery for regional eco-environmental quality evaluation [J], Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 128, 1, pp. 217-229, (2007)
  • [4] ZHU Dongyu, CHEN Tao, ZHEN Na, Et al., Monitoring the effects of open-pit mining on the eco-environment using a moving window based remote sensing ecological index [J], Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 13, pp. 15716-15728, (2020)
  • [5] NIE Xinran, Zhenqi HU, ZHU Qi, Et al., Research on temporal and spatial resolution and the driving forces of ecological environment quality in coal mining areas considering topographic correction [J], Remote Sensing, 13, 14, (2021)
  • [6] HE Chunyang, GAO Bin, HUANG Qingxu, Et al., Environmental degradation in the urban areas of China:Evidence from multi-source remote sensing data [ J], Remote sensing of Environment, 193, 2, pp. 65-75, (2017)
  • [7] MOHAMMAD K F, SOLMAZ F, WENG Qihao, Et al., Remotely sensed urban surface ecological index (RSUSEI):An analytical framework for assessing the surface ecological status in urban environments [J], Remote Sensing, 12, 12, (2020)
  • [8] Xisheng HU, Hanqiu XU, A new remote sensing index based on the pressure-state-response framework to assess regional ecological change [J], Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 6, pp. 5381-5393, (2019)
  • [9] WANG Jie, MA Jiali, XIE Feifei, Et al., Improvement of remote sensing ecological index in arid regions:Taking Ulan Buh Desert as an example [ J ], Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 11, pp. 3795-3804, (2020)
  • [10] NIE Xinran, Zhenqi HU, RUAN Mengying, Et al., Remote-sensing evaluation and temporal and spatial change detection of ecological environment quality in coal-mining areas [ J], Remote Sensing, 14, 2, (2022)