Interaction law and mechanical characteristics between pipe and soil during frost heaving

被引:3
|
作者
Huang L. [1 ,2 ]
Sheng Y. [1 ]
Wu J. [1 ]
Huang X. [1 ,2 ]
He B. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
来源
Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology) | 2020年 / 51卷 / 04期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Constraint; Deformation; Force; Frost heave; Interaction; Pipe;
D O I
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2020.04.017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to study the mechanism characteristics and the interaction law between pipe and soil during frost heaving, the silty clay with high frost susceptibility and the stainless steel pipe were used as materials, and the test was carried out in a small environmental model testing machine without external water supply. Firstly, the resistance strain gauges were pasted to the surface of pipe, then the pipe and support were placed in the open heat preservation box. Secondly, the soil sample was filled into the open heat preservation box while the sensors including temperature, moisture and soil pressure sensors were arranged at each measuring point synchronously. Finally, the variables such as temperature, water content, pressure, frost heave, deformation and stress of pipe were monitored in real time during the testing. Then the testing data collected from the process of frost heaving which lasts for 70 h was analyzed and discussed. The results show that the essence of pipe restraining frost heave during frost heaving is to restrain the moisture migration in soil. The distribution law of unfrozen water content and the water content after frost heaving proves the occurrence of moisture migration in soil. The interaction between pipe and soil leads to coordinate changes and keeps a dynamic balance all the time. Frost heaving causes the pipe deformation while the pipe restrains the frost heave of soil. The deformation of pipe and the distance from pipe determine the constraint strength to frost heaving. The smaller the pipe deformation, the greater the constraining rate, the larger the soil pressure, the smaller the moisture migration and the smaller the frost heave. However, at the same time, the frost heave on both sides of pipe is obviously larger than that below the pipe. The farther away from the pipe, the smaller the constraining rate, the smaller the soil pressure, the greater the moisture migration, and the larger the frost heave. The soil pressure increases with time, and increases exponentially with constraining rate, but decreases exponentially with frost heave. Frost heaving causes pipe stress, and the most disadvantageous stress distribution position is in 4/8 section of the pipe. The existence of circumferential stress indicates the section of the pipe deformation, so the effect of circumferential stress cannot be ignored in the analysis when the pipe actes on a larger frost heaving force or external load. © 2020, Central South University Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / 1036
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] JIN Huijun, YU Wenbing, CHEN Youchang, Et al., (Differential) Frost heave and thaw settlement in the engineering design and construction of oil pipelines in permafrost regions: A review, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 27, 3, pp. 454-464, (2005)
  • [2] LIU Quanlin, YANG Min, Analytical model and parameters determination of interaction between buried pipe and soil, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 25, 5, pp. 728-731, (2004)
  • [3] NIXON J F, MACINNES K L., Application of pipe temperature simulator for Norman Wells oil pipeline, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33, 1, pp. 140-149, (1996)
  • [4] METJE N, CHAPMAN D N, WALTON R, Et al., Real time condition monitoring of buried water pipes, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 28, pp. 315-320, (2012)
  • [5] PALMER A C, CURSON N S T., Physical model study of arctic pipeline settlements, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Permafrost, pp. 1324-1329, (1988)
  • [6] CARLSON L E., Testing pipelining techniques in warm permafrost, The 4th International Conference on Permafrost, pp. 97-102, (1983)
  • [7] SLUSARCHUK W A, CLARK J I, NIXON J F, Et al., Field test results of a chilled pipeline buried in unfrozen ground, The 3rd International Permafrost Conference, pp. 10-13, (1978)
  • [8] ZHANG Haifeng, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Peng, Et al., Soil cell model experiment design of pipe-soil interaction, Geological Science and Technology Information, 35, 4, pp. 219-222, (2016)
  • [9] SHMULEVICH I, GALILI N, FOUX A., Soil stress distribution around buried pipes, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 112, 5, pp. 481-494, (1986)
  • [10] ZHOU Min, DU Yanjun, ZHANG Yajun, Et al., Variation of soil arching effect during burying process of hdpe pipes, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 34, 2, pp. 414-424, (2015)