Effects of Different Beam Elements on Dynamic Responses of Coupled Train-bridge System

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Zhihui [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Ye, Bailong [1 ]
Gong, Wei [1 ]
Guo, Xiangrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Central South University, Changsha,410075, China
关键词
Railroad cars - Railroads - Shells (structures) - Automobile bodies - Natural frequencies - Vibrations (mechanical) - Acceleration - Box girder bridges - Finite element method - Particle beams - Railroad transportation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research purposes: Based on train-track-bridge coupling dynamics, the effects of three types of simply supported beams modeled as a Euler-Bernoulli beam, Timoshenko beam and shell-element system, respectively, on the dynamic responses of the coupled train-track-bridge system are studied. Then, taking a six-span simply supported bridge passed through by a high-speed train composed of 12 cars for the case study, the comparisons of dynamic responses of three types of coupled train-track-bridge system are undertaken. Research conclusions:(1) The natural frequencies of the three types of simply supported beam models with the same section and material parameters are different. The Euler-Bernoulli beam has the highest natural frequency, as well as the resonant speed. (2) At the operating speed, the acceleration response of the simply supported beam is affected significantly by the type of element, and the Euler-Bernoulli beam has the smallest bridge acceleration. The vibration acceleration of the Timoshenko beam is close to the calculation result at the midpoint of the bottom plate of the box girder of the shell-element system. The top deck of the box girder of the shell-element system, which subjects to the local high-frequency excitation, has the highest acceleration. The acceleration of the first and last vehicle body of the three types of models coincides well. (3) At the resonant speed, the acceleration and displacement of bridge obtained by the Euler-Bernoulli beam and the Timoshenko beam are in excellent agreement, but on the whole, they are larger than that of the shell-element system. The Euler-Bernoulli beam model is quite different from the Timoshenko beam model at the acceleration of the last vehicle body. The dynamic response of the last car is considerably larger than that of the first car due to the passage of the serial beams in resonance. (4) The research results can provide reference for the selection of bridge numerical model in the study of train-track-bridge coupling vibration. © 2020, Editorial Department of Journal of Railway Engineering Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy Dynamic Responses of Train-Bridge Coupled System Based on Information Entropy
    Xiang, Ping
    Zeng, Yingying
    Jiang, Lizhong
    Zhao, Han
    Hu, Huifang
    Zhang, Peng
    Liu, Xiaochun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2024, 150 (11)
  • [2] Dynamic responses of train-bridge system under earthquakes
    Zhang, N
    Xia, H
    Guo, WW
    [J]. TIVC'2001: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRAFIC INDUCED VIBRATIONS & CONTROLS, 2001, : 99 - 106
  • [3] Bridge stress calculation based on the dynamic response of coupled train-bridge system
    Li, Huile
    Xia, He
    Soliman, Mohamed
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 99 : 334 - 345
  • [4] Field measurement of the dynamic responses of a suspended monorail train-bridge system
    He, Qinglie
    Cai, Chengbiao
    Zhu, Shengyang
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Wang, Kaiyun
    Zhai, Wanming
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2020, 234 (10) : 1093 - 1108
  • [5] Dynamic analysis of LIM train-bridge system
    Suzhou Municipal Engineering Design Institute, Suzhou 215007, China
    不详
    [J]. Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao, 2008, 6 (608-613):
  • [6] Sensitivity and dynamic analysis of train-bridge coupled system with multiple random factors
    Liu, Xiang
    Jiang, Lizhong
    Lai, Zhipeng
    Xiang, Ping
    Chen, Yuanjun
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 221
  • [7] Calculation of train-bridge dynamic interaction with different model
    Gyorgyi, J.
    [J]. Structural Dynamics - EURODYN 2005, Vols 1-3, 2005, : 1095 - 1100
  • [8] Seismic response analysis of a train-bridge coupled system considering topographic effects
    Qiao, Hong
    Xia, He
    Du, Xian-Ting
    Nan, Yong
    [J]. Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34 (17): : 69 - 76
  • [9] Effects of Wind Barrier Porosity on the Coupled Vibration of a Train-Bridge System in a Crosswind
    Guo, Xiangrong
    Tang, Junfeng
    [J]. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 29 (02) : 268 - 275
  • [10] Resonance analysis of train-bridge dynamic interaction system
    Guo, WW
    Xia, H
    Zhang, N
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL VIBRATIONS: PREDICTION, MONITORING, MITIGATION AND EVALUATION (ISEV 2005), 2005, : 181 - 187