Prediction of tunnel rockbursts based on data preprocessing technology considering influences of stress gradient of surrounding rock

被引:0
|
作者
Xia Y. [1 ]
Zhang H. [1 ]
Lin M. [2 ]
Yan Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan
[2] School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan
关键词
data preprocessing; hole diameter; rockburst prediction; stress gradient of surrounding rock; underground engineering;
D O I
10.11779/CJGE20220701
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the current rockburst prediction investigation frequently ignores outliers, missing values, sample imbalance in the rockburst dataset and the influences of surrounding rock stress gradient, a complete preprocessing process of rockburst data is proposed, and the hole diameter index that indirectly represents the stress gradient of surrounding rock of tunnel is employed to establish the multi-factor comprehensive prediction model for tunnel rockbursts. At the stage of the data collection, considering the variation in stress conditions between the tunnel, stope and tunnel group, 306 samples of rockbursts in tunnels are isolated from the rockburst database. At the stage of determining prediction index, five indices are selected including the hole diameter (D0), the maximum tangential stress (δθmax ), the uniaxial compressive strength (δc ), the uniaxial tensile strength of the rock (σt) and the elastic energy deformation index (Wet). At the stage of the data preprocessing, the multiple imputation method of random forest (MI-RF) is introduced to fill in the missing values. Three unsupervised algorithms including the K-nearest neighbor (KNN), the isolation forest (IForest) and the local outlier factor (LOF) are introduced to comprehensively evaluate the rockburst dataset and removed outliers. The adaptive comprehensive oversampling (ADASYN) algorithm is introduced to expand the number of minority samples. At the stage of the model validation, five types of models including the support vector machine (SVM), the random forest (RF), the gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT), the adaptive boosting algorithm (AdaBoost) and the extreme gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost) are adopted for comparison. The results demonstrate that the aforementioned models based on the data preprocessing and the hole diameter index are all the best among similar algorithm models. Without the data preprocessing, the model considering the hole diameter index is better than those without considering the hole diameter. © 2023 Chinese Society of Civil Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1987 / 1994
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] FENG X T, LIU J, CHEN B, Et al., Monitoring, warning, and control of rockburst in deep metal mines, Engineering, 3, 4, pp. 538-545, (2017)
  • [2] GONG Fengqiang, PAN Junfeng, JIANG Quan, The difference analysis of rock burst and coal burst and key mechanisms of deep engineering geological hazards, Journal of Engineering Geology, 29, 4, pp. 933-961, (2021)
  • [3] ZHANG Chuanqing, YU Jin, CHEN Jun, Et al., Evaluation method for potential rockburst in underground engineering, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 37, pp. 341-349, (2016)
  • [4] XU Chen, LIU Xiaoli, WANG Enzhi, Et al., Prediction and classification of strain mode rockburst based on five-factor criterion and combined weight-ideal point method, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 39, 12, pp. 2245-2252, (2017)
  • [5] WANG C, WU A, LU H, Et al., Predicting rockburst tendency based on fuzzy matter-element model, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 75, pp. 224-232, (2015)
  • [6] JIA Yipeng, LU Qing, SHANG Yuequan, Et al., Rockburst prediction based on evidence theory, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 36, 6, pp. 1079-1086, (2014)
  • [7] GAO WEI, Prediction of rock burst based on ant colony clustering algorithm, Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 32, 6, pp. 874-880, (2010)
  • [8] PU Y, APEL D B, WANG C, Et al., Evaluation of burst liability in kimberlite using support vector machine, Acta Geophysica, 66, pp. 973-982, (2018)
  • [9] WANG C, CHUAI X, SHI F, Et al., Experimental investigation of predicting rockburst using Bayesian model, Geomechanics & engineering, 15, 6, pp. 1153-1160, (2018)
  • [10] TAN Wenkan, YE Yicheng, HU Nanyan, Et al., Severe rock burst prediction based on the combination of LOF and improved SMOTE algorithm, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 40, 6, pp. 1186-1194, (2021)