Towards Spatial Range Queries Under Local Differential Privacy

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang X. [1 ]
Fu N. [1 ]
Meng X. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Computer & Information Engineering, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou
[2] School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Constrained inference; Grid decomposition; Local differential privacy; Randomized response; Spatial range query;
D O I
10.7544/issn1000-1239.2020.20190360
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
User data collection and analysis with local differential privacy has attracted considerable attention in recent years. The trade-off among the domain size of user data, encoding method, and perturbation method directly constrains the accuracy of spatial range query. To remedy the deficiency caused by the current encoding and perturbating method, this paper employs grid and quadtree to propose an efficient solution, called GT-R, to answer spatial range query. GT-R uses a uniform grid to decompose the data domain, and generate unit sized regions. Based on these regions, an indexing quadtree is built. And then each user encodes his/her data with the quadtree shared from server, and runs the optimal randomized response on each node of the sampled level in the quadtree and reports the sampled level along with the perturbed value. The server accumulates reports from users to reconstruct a quadtree comprising sum of reports from all users. Besides, to boost the accuracy of range query, the server relies on post-processing skill for consistency on the frequency of each node. GT-R method is compared with existing methods on the large-scale real datasets. The experimental results show that GT-R outperforms its competitors, achieves the accurate results of spatial range query. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 858
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Qardaji W.H., Yang W., Li N., Differentially private grids for geospatial data, Proc of the 29th IEEE Int Conf on Data Engineering, pp. 32-33, (2013)
  • [2] Cormode G., Procopiuc C.M., Srivastava D., Et al., Differentially private spatial decompositions, Proc of the 28th IEEE Int Conf on Data Engineering, pp. 20-31, (2012)
  • [3] Zhang J., Xiao X., Xie X., PrivTree: A differentially private algorithm for hierarchical decompositions, Proc of the 2016 ACM SIGMOD Int Conf on Management of Data, pp. 155-170, (2016)
  • [4] Erlingsson U., Pihur V., Korolova A., Rappor randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response, Proc of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conf on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1054-1067, (2014)
  • [5] Bassily R., Smith A., Local, private, efficient protocols for succinct histograms, Proc of the 47th Annual ACM on Symp on Theory of Computing, pp. 127-135, (2015)
  • [6] Wang T., Bloci J., Li N., Et al., Locally differentially private protocols for frequency estimation, Proc of the 26th USENIX Security Symp., pp. 729-745, (2017)
  • [7] Duchi J.C., Jordan M.I., Local privacy and statistical minimax rates, Proc of the 54th Annual IEEE Symp on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 429-438, (2013)
  • [8] Duchi J.C., Jordan M.I., Wainwright M.J., Minimax optimal procedures for locally estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113, 521, pp. 182-201, (2018)
  • [9] Nguyen T.T., Xiao X., Yang Y., Et al., Collecting and analyzing data from smart device users with local differential privacy
  • [10] Wang N., Xiao X., Yang Y., Et al., Collecting and analyzing multidimensional data with local differential privacy, Proc of the 35th IEEE Int Conf on Data Engineering, pp. 638-649, (2019)