Life Cycle Prediction Assessment of Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles for 2035

被引:3
|
作者
Fu P. [1 ]
Lan L.-B. [1 ]
Chen Y. [1 ]
Hao Z. [1 ]
Xing Y.-X. [1 ]
Cai X. [1 ]
Zhang C.-M. [1 ]
Chen Y.-S. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an
来源
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2023年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词
carbon emission; different hydrogen production methods; electricity structure; energy saving and new energy vehicles; life cycle assessment(LCA);
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.202208236
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The development of energy saving and new energy vehicles is an important technology path to reduce carbon emissions for the transportation industry. To quantitatively predict the life cycle carbon emissions of energy saving and new energy vehicles, this study used the life cycle assessment method and selected the fuel economy level, lightweight level, carbon emission factor of electricity structure, and carbon emission factor of hydrogen production as key performance parameters to establish inventories of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV), mild hybrid electrical vehicles (MHEV), heavy hybrid electrical vehicles (HEV), battery electrical vehicles (BEV), and fuel cell vehicles (FCV) based on automotive-related policy and technical routes. The sensitivity of carbon emission factors of electricity structure and different hydrogen production methods were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the current life cycle carbon emissions (CO2 equivalent) of ICEV, MHEV, HEV, BEV, and FCV were 207.8, 195.2, 149.9, 113.3, and 204.7 g•km - 1 , respectively. By 2035, BEV and FCV were predicted to have a significant reduction of 69.1% and 49.3%, respectively, compared with ICEV. The carbon emission factor of electricity structure had the most significant influence on BEV life cycle carbon emissions. In terms of different hydrogen production methods of FCV, hydrogen demand should be mainly supplied by industrial hydrogen by-product purification in the short-term future, whereas hydrogen energy production by water electrolysis and hydrogen production from fossil energy combined with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology should be used to meet the hydrogen demand of FCV in the long-term future, so as to achieve a significant improvement in the life cycle carbon reduction benefits of FCV. © 2023 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2365 / 2374
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Qiao Q Y, Zhao F Q, Liu Z W, Et al., Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China, Applied Energy, 204, pp. 1399-1411, (2017)
  • [2] Wu Z X, Wang M, Zheng J H, Et al., Life cycle greenhouse gas emission reduction potential of battery electric vehicle [ J ], Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, pp. 462-470, (2018)
  • [3] Burchart-Korol D, Jursova S, Fol誰ga P, Et al., Environmental life cycle assessment of electric vehicles in Poland and the Czech Republic, Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, pp. 476-487, (2018)
  • [4] Sisani F, Di Maria F, Cesari D., Environmental and human health impact of different powertrain passenger cars in a life cycle perspective. A focus on health risk and oxidative potential of particulate matter components [ J ], Science of the Total Environment, 805, (2022)
  • [5] Tagliaferri C, Evangelisti S, Acconcia F, Et al., Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: a cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 112, pp. 298-309, (2016)
  • [6] Sun X, Luo X L, Zhang Z, Et al., Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries for electric passenger vehicles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, (2020)
  • [7] Cusenza M A, Bobba S, Ardente F, Et al., Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles [ J ], Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, pp. 634-649, (2019)
  • [8] Yin R S, Hu S H, Yang Y., Life cycle inventories of the commonly used materials for lithium-ion batteries in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, pp. 960-971, (2019)
  • [9] Marques P, Garcia R, Kulay L, Et al., Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade [ J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, pp. 787-794, (2019)
  • [10] Shu X, Guo Y F, Yang W X, Et al., Life-cycle assessment of the environmental impact of the batteries used in pure electric passenger cars, Energy Reports, 7, pp. 2302-2315, (2021)