Portfolio optimization based on multi-task relationship learning

被引:0
|
作者
Ni X. [1 ]
Shen X. [1 ]
Zhao H. [2 ]
Qiu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Software and Microelectronics, Peking University, Beijing
[2] School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Combining estimation; Multi-task relationship learning; Portfolio optimization;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2020-2700
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Among all the portfolio optimization studies that consider uncertainty, it has been shown that by combining different strategies, estimation error can be hedged and better out-of-sample performance can be achieved. In general, these kinds of combining strategies rely heavily on the distribution assumption to decide the combining weights, which may weaken their practical applicability. To improve this, this paper utilizes multi-task relationship learning (MTRL) framework to estimate global minimum variance (GMV) weight and mean-variance (MV) tangency weight simultaneously, by estimating the correlation matrix between these two weights, achieving a combining-like result. In terms of empirical tests, this paper uses daily data of A-share market spanning from 2000 to 2019 to construct two datasets: factor portfolios and stock portfolios randomly collected from HS300 index constituents. The empirical out-of-sample result based on factor portfolio dataset suggests that MTRL-MV can achieve better performance than original MV, equally-weighted (EW) and other combining strategies in terms of Sharpe ratio, standard deviation and turnover. In the end, this paper uses three datasets: The subsample of factor portfolios from Chinese A share and US stock market and individual stock portfolios, to conduct robustness test, which confirms MTRL-MV's improvement compared to other strategies. © 2021, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1438
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Markowitz H., Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 7, 1, pp. 77-91, (1952)
  • [2] Ni X M, Qian L, Zhao H M, Et al., Large-dimensional covariance matrix estimation and its application with RCM using high frequency data, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 39, 8, pp. 1943-1953, (2019)
  • [3] Merton R C., On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 4, pp. 323-361, (1980)
  • [4] Best M J, Grauer R R., On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results, The Review of Financial Studies, 4, 2, pp. 315-342, (1991)
  • [5] Michaud R O., The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is 'optimized' optimal?, Financial Analysts Journal, 45, 1, pp. 31-42, (1989)
  • [6] Green R C, Hollifield B., When will mean-variance efficient portfolios be well diversified?, The Journal of Finance, 47, 5, pp. 1785-1809, (1992)
  • [7] Demiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R., Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy?, The Review of Financial studies, 22, 5, pp. 1915-1953, (2007)
  • [8] Demiguel V, Garlappi L, Nogales F J, Et al., A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms, Management Science, 55, 5, pp. 798-812, (2009)
  • [9] Jagannathan R, Ma T., Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps, The Journal of Finance, 58, 4, pp. 1651-1683, (2003)
  • [10] Ledoit O, Wolf M., Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30, 4, pp. 110-119, (2004)