Analysis of risk-targeted decision parameters of seismic ground motions based on seismic design code and ground motion zonation map of China

被引:0
|
作者
Wang C. [1 ,2 ]
Lu D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Key Lab of Structure Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
[2] Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disaster of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
关键词
Conditional collapse probability; Ground motion decision; Logarithmic standard deviation of fragility; Risk-targeted; Target collapse risk;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.0703
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, the analysis of risk-targeted decision parameters of seismic ground motions for common buildings were conducted based on the GB 50011-2010 'Code for seismic design of buildings' and the GB 18306-2015 'Seismic ground motion parameters zonation map of China'. The values of the target collapse risk, the logarithmic standard deviation of the fragility, and the conditional collapse probabilities of the maximum considered earthquake (MCE), the design basis earthquake (DBE), and the very rare earthquake (VRE) were discussed. The risk-targeted ground motion decision based on the ground motion intensity in the seismic design code and the ground motion zonation map of China were used to verify the rationality of the analysis results of decision parameters, and the risk-targeted decision parameters of both singular and group structures in China were given and analyzed. The results indicate that, for singular structure, the values of the target collapse risk, the conditional collapse probabilities of the MCE, the DBE, and the VRE are equal to 1.0%, 10.0%, 0.04%, and 54.7% respectively when the logarithmic standard deviation is equal to 0.3, while they are equal to 1.0%, 11.0%, 0.2%, and 44.6% respectively when the logarithmic standard deviation is equal to 0.4. For group structures, the logarithmic standard deviation, the conditional collapse probabilities of the MCE, the DBE and the VRE are equal to 0.6, 10.4%, 1.1%, and 30.2% respectively when the target collapse risk is equal to 1.0%, while they are 0.6, 3.6%, 0.2%, and 13. 2% respectively when the target collapse risk is equal to 0.4%. Through the analysis, it could be found that: when the logarithmic standard deviation is not large than 0.6, with the increase of the logarithmic standard deviation, the conditional collapse probabilities of the DBE, and the VRE increase and decrease gradually respectively, while the conditional collapse probabilities of the MCE does not change significantly; given the same logarithmic standard deviation, the conditional collapse probabilities of the MCE, the DBE, and the VRE all increase gradually with the increase of the target collapse risk. © 2020, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] LU Dagang, ZHOU Zhou, WANG Cong, Et al., Uniform risk-targeted definitions and decision-making of four seismic design levels considering very rare earthquake, China Civil Engineering Journal, 51, 11, pp. 41-52, (2018)
  • [2] YE Lieping, QU Zhe, LU Xinzheng, Et al., Collapse prevention of building structures: a lesson from the Wenchuan earthquake, Journal of Building Structures, 29, 4, pp. 42-50, (2008)
  • [3] CHEN Kun, GAO Mengtan, Controlling seismic collapse risk of general construction projects in China mainland, Journal of Building Structures, 36, 1, pp. 23-29, (2015)
  • [4] CORNELL C A, KRAWINKLER H., Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, PEER Center News, 3, 2, pp. 1-4, (2000)
  • [5] SILVA V, CROWLEY H, BAZZURRO P., Advances on risk-targeted hazard estimation within the European context, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP12), pp. 1-8, (2015)
  • [6] YU Xiaohui, Probabilistic seismic fragility and risk analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures, pp. 116-165, (2012)
  • [7] Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures: ASCE/SEI 7-10, (2010)
  • [8] Quantification of building seismic performance factors: FEMA P695, (2009)
  • [9] WAYANSENGARA I, MASYHURIRSYAM, SIDI I D, Et al., Development of earthquake risk-targeted ground motions for Indonesian earthquake resistance building code SNI 1726-2012, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP12), pp. 1-6, (2015)
  • [10] NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures: FEMA P1050, (2015)