Passive location method based on TDOA/FDOA in case of 4 receivers

被引：0
|
作者：
Guo Q. [1 ]
Li W. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
来源：
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica | 2021年 / 42卷 / 02期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Firefly algorithm; Frequency difference of arrival; Passive location; Time difference of arrival; Weighted least squares;
D O I：
10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24236
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A new joint location method (MWLS-FA), combining the Modified Weighted Least Squares (MWLS) method and the Firefly Algorithm (FA), is proposed to solve the poor timeliness problem in the case of 4 receivers in the three-dimensional moving target passive location system based on Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) and Frequency Difference of Arrival (FDOA). This method first modifies the Weighted Least Squares (WLS) method by constructing a new set of equations, such that the MWLS method can also obtain the initial values of the target position and velocity in the case of 4 receivers. Then, this initial value is used to provide a dynamic search area for the FA method which is also adjusted and improved in adding constraints and selecting parameters. Simulation results show that the accuracy of the proposed method can reach the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), and is remarkably better than the traditional search methods in terms of timeliness and noise resistance. Meanwhile, the accuracy of this method is superior to Two-Step Weighted Least Squares (TSWLS) and Constrained Weighted Least Squares (CWLS) in the case of 5 receivers. © 2021, Beihang University Aerospace Knowledge Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] XU Z, QU C W, WANG C H., Performance analysis for multiple moving observers passive localization in the presence of systematic errors, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 34, 3, pp. 629-635, (2013)
  • [2] WEINSTEIN E., Optimal source localization and tracking from passive array measurements, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 30, 1, pp. 69-76, (1982)
  • [3] GUSTAFSSON T, RAO B D, TRIVEDI M., Source localization in reverberant environments: Modeling and statistical analysis, IEEE Transactions on Speech & Audio Processing, 11, 6, pp. 791-803, (2003)
  • [4] WANG W, WANG X P, MA Y H., Multi-target localization based on multi-stage wiener filter for bistatic MIMO radar, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 33, 7, pp. 1281-1288, (2012)
  • [5] STOCIA P, LI J., Lecture notes-source lozalization from range-difference measurements, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23, 6, pp. 63-66, (2006)
  • [6] WANG C, QI F, SHI G, Et al., A linear combination based weighted least square approach for target localization with noisy range measurements, Signal Processing, 94, pp. 202-211, (2014)
  • [7] GRIFFIN A, ALEXANDRIDIS A, PAVLIDI D, Et al., Localizing multiple audio sources in a wireless acoustic sensor network, Signal Processing, 107, pp. 54-67, (2015)
  • [8] FOY W H., Position-location solutions by Taylor-Series estimation, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 12, 2, pp. 187-194, (1976)
  • [9] YANG K, JIANG L, LUO Z Q., Efficient semidefinite relaxation for robust geolocation of unknown emitter by a satellite cluster using TDOA and FDOA measurements, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 2584-2587, (2011)
  • [10] WANG G, LI Y, ANSARI N., A semidefinite relaxation method for source localization using TDOA and FDOA measurements, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62, 2, pp. 853-862, (2013)
123