Correlations Between Liquefaction Potential Indices Assessed by CPTu and SPT Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Wang J.-S. [1 ]
Lu C.-C. [1 ]
Hwang J.-H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering Division, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan
关键词
Calibration; Liquefaction potential index; Piezocone penetration test (CPTu); Soil liquefaction;
D O I
10.6652/JoCICHE.202103_33(1).0008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CPTu is a more reliable and high resolution investigation method than SPT in achieving better site characterization. However, due to the rich experience of liquefaction and non-liquefaction SPT-N cases in the past, the SPT methods are still more popular in use than CPTu ones in engineering practice. It is well known that there exists considerable discrepancy of the liquefaction assessment results between the CPTu and SPT methods. The former usually yields more conservative result. To promote the practical application of CPTu methods, it is necessary to clarify the discrepancy between these two methods. To this, this paper collects the high quality records of close by CPTu-SPT pairs at several sites in Taiwan to investigate the influence of data resolution of CPTu on the assessed liquefaction potential and further calibrates the discrepancy of liquefaction potential indices (LPI) assessed by the two methods. The results show that the influence of data resolution of CPTu is not significant on LPI. The calibration results as well as the corresponding transformation model could be a valuable reference to attain the consistency between LPI assessed by these two methods. © 2021, Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Liquefaction of soils during earthquake, (1985)
  • [2] Youd T. L., Idriss I. M., Andrus R. D., Arango I., Castro G., Christian J. T., Dobry R., Liam, Finn W. D., Harder L. F., Hynes M. E., Ishihara K., Koester J. P., Laio S. S. C., Marcuson W. F., Martin G. R., Mitchell J. K., Moriwaki Y., Power M.S., Robertson P.K., Seed R. B., Stokoe K. H, Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, Jounral of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASC
  • [3] Boulanger R. W., Idriss I. M., Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays, (2004)
  • [4] Atwater B., State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, (2016)
  • [5] Seed B., Idriss I., Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 97, 9, pp. 1249-1273, (1971)
  • [6] Seed B., Tokimatsu K., Harder L. F., Chun R. M., Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 111, 12, pp. 1425-1445, (1985)
  • [7] Cetin O. K., Seed R. B., Kiureghian A. D., Tokimatsu K., Harder L. F., Kayen R. E., Moss R. E. S, Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 130, 12, pp. 1314-1340, (2004)
  • [8] Idriss I. M., Boulanger R.W., Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes, Soil Dynamica and Earthquake Engineering, 26, 2-4, pp. 115-130, (2006)
  • [9] Idriss I. M., Boulanger R. W., Soil liquefaction during earthquakes, (2008)
  • [10] 社團法人日本道路協會 道路橋示方書同解說, V 耐 震設計編, 社團法人日本道路協會, 日本, (1996)