Empirical analysis on the sustainable development of China's outward foreign direct investment from the perspective of economic institution

被引:0
|
作者
Wang C. [1 ]
Hong J. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing
来源
Hong, Juan (hongjuan@bjut.edu.cn) | 1600年 / International Information and Engineering Technology Association卷 / 15期
关键词
Belt and Road (B&R) strategy; Economic institutional distance; Institutional preference; Outward foreign direct investment (OFDI); Sustainable development;
D O I
10.18280/ijsdp.150314
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The countries along the Belt and Road (B&R) are important destinations of China's outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). Based on the panel data (2003-2017) on China's OFDI in 65 B&R countries, this paper sets up a Heckman two-stage model, and then empirically analyzes how China's OFDI is affected by the difference between China and the host country in economic institution. In addition, the authors explored whether China has institutional preference in the OFDI with different investment motives. The empirical test shows that: investment selection and investment scale of China's OFDI are promoted to different degrees by the economic institution of the host country, and the absolute distance between China and the host country in economic institution; China has different institutional preferences in market-seeking OFDI between the selection stage and the investment stage; In terms of technology-seeking OFDI, host countries with short economic institutional distance are preferred in the selection stage, and host countries with good economic institution and long economic institutional distance are preferred in the investment stage. The research results provide empirical evidence for China to continuously implement OFDI in B&R countries and create a green investment environment. © 2020 WITPress. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Analysis of the Spatial Links in China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment
    Sun, Changfu
    Shao, Yanmin
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, INFORMATICS AND SERVICE SCIENCES (LISS' 2016), 2016,
  • [2] Economic Freedom and Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis
    Anwar, Amar Iqbal
    Mughal, Mazhar
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2012, 32 (04): : 2991 - 3007
  • [3] Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Development
    Murthy, Bhanu K., V
    [J]. TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS REVIEW, 2015, 7 (03) : 279 - 296
  • [4] An Empirical Analyses on Determinants of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment
    Wang Wentan
    Bai Yan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS FOR THE 5TH EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PT II, 2009, : 170 - 177
  • [5] The Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Carbon Emission toward China's Sustainable Development
    Tan, Feifei
    Wan, Hao
    Jiang, Xiangjun
    Niu, Zhiyuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [6] Study on Outward Foreign Direct Investment from China enterprises From the Financial Development Perspective
    Jiang, Yapeng
    Fu, Yuguo
    Wang, Fei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MODELING AND SIMULATION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 444-445 : 1655 - +
  • [7] China's outward foreign direct investment
    He, Wei
    Lyles, Marjorie A.
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2008, 51 (06) : 485 - 491
  • [8] Governance, financial development and China's outward foreign direct investment
    Gao, Chen
    Wen, Ya
    Yang, Deyong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [9] Do Foreign Direct Investment and Migration Influence the Sustainable Development of Outward Foreign Direct Investment? From the Perspective of Intellectual Property Rights Protection
    Zhang, Huiying
    Liu, Yikang
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [10] Empirical Analysis of the Interaction between Sino-foreign Relations and China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment
    Liu Yadi
    Liu Xiaohui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH (2017) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 95 - 100