In-situ Calibration Method for Dual-sensor Weighing System Based on Sensitivity Change Mechanism

被引:0
|
作者
Huang J. [1 ]
Lin S. [1 ]
Huang W. [1 ]
Li J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Eng., Sichuan Univ., Chengdu
[2] School of Info. Sci. and Technol., Southwest Univ. of Sci. and Technol., Mianyang
关键词
Calibration; Coupling coefficient; Dual-sensor; Force analysis; Weighing system;
D O I
10.15961/j.jsuese.201900340
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The sensitivity coefficient is no longer the same before and after the installation of weighing system sensor due to the unbalance loading resulting from the shape error of the sensor mounting surface. Thus, it need to be re-calibrated before use. For dual-sensor systems, due to the different installation conditions of each sensor, the sensitivity coefficient is not only different before and after installation, but also not the same as each other, on the other hand, due to the randomness of load center when calibrating, there is no guarantee that the two sensor bear the same force, so the load weight is unknown. The stochastic interaction between unbalance loading and randomness of loading position makes it difficult to calibrate the sensitivity coefficient of the dual-sensor system. At present, the common calibration method is to attach potentiometer and other components to the processing circuit to changing the magnification of the original signal to make the sensitivity of each path be the same, and then load standard weight to complete the calibration. This method needs to change the original circuit, which may bring unknown influence, and it's difficult to realize for integrated processing circuit. Aiming at the these problems the sensor force model was established, the influence mechanism of unbalance loading and gravity position on sensitivity coefficient was defined by force analysis, and the sensitivity calibration algorithm was deduced. The sensitivity coefficient of dual sensor system was decomposed into two parts, coupling coefficient and conversion coefficient, and calibration could be completed after loading two times in different positions with the same standard weight. This new calibration method could ensure the measurement accuracy of the system under unbalance loading. The experimental results showed that the new method did not change the original measuring circuit and mechanical structure, and the system error was less than 0.03%. © 2020, Editorial Department of Advanced Engineering Sciences. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 217
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Sun Renyun, Determination of sensors and system sensitivity in the motor vehicle ABS test-bed, Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 41, 3, pp. 85-88, (2001)
  • [2] Zhao Yanzhi, Zhao Tieshi, Cao Hucheng, Et al., Measuring principle and calibration experiment of the overloaded selfcalibration parallel four-dimensional force measuring platform, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53, 23, pp. 53-61, (2017)
  • [3] Podczeck F., The development of an instrumented tampfilling capsule machine Ⅱ, European Journal of Pharma-Ceutical Sciences, 12, 4, pp. 515-521, (2001)
  • [4] Liu Jiuqing, Overview and Research Project of Dynamic and Numeral Weighing technology, Industrial Measurement, 21, 2, pp. 4-10, (2011)
  • [5] Li Hui, The design of weighing control instrument for filling equipment, (2017)
  • [6] Llusa M, Faulhammer E, Biserni S, Et al., The effect of capsule-filling machine vibrations on average fill weight, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 451, 1, pp. 381-387, (2013)
  • [7] Sun Maoquan, Yan Weiyue, Control system of a gravimetric (weighting) fluid-filling machine, Light Industry Machinery, 3, pp. 94-96, (2007)
  • [8] Zhou Wei, Bao Jiandong, Ding Lianghua, Nonlinear correction of sensor calibration, Journal of Test and Measurement Technology, 27, 4, pp. 358-361, (2013)
  • [9] Gao Xiaojiao, Huang Jie, Liu Chenyuan, Study on nonlinear correction for drug filling line dynamic weighing system, Industrial Control Computer, 28, 10, pp. 102-103, (2015)
  • [10] Wang Zhisheng, Wang Daobo, Cai Zongyan, Unified data processing method for sensor calibration, Journal of Transducer Technology, 23, 3, pp. 46-48, (2004)