A pseudo-peak removing method of remote field eddy current in ferromagnetic pipelines

被引:0
|
作者
Sun H. [1 ,2 ]
Shi Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang W. [1 ,2 ]
Li Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu
[2] Information Geoscience Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu
关键词
Mathematical morphological filter (MMF); Nelder-mead simplex method; Pseudo-peak removing; Radial basis function (RBF); Remote field eddy current testing (RFECT);
D O I
10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.J1904794
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In remote field eddy current testing(RFECT)of ferromagnetic pipes, because the eddy current signal penetrates the pipe wall twice from the exciting winding and pick-up winding, the same defec twill affect the propagation of the remote field eddy current signal twice, which leads to the appearance of two peaks in the received signal, they are called real peak and pseudo-peak here. The real peak contains the useful information such as the position of the pipe defect, whereas the pseudo-peak acts as a disturbance to the defect positioning in the pipeline test and evaluation. In order to eliminate the disturbance of the pseudo-peak to defect positioning, this paper proposes a novel pseudo-peak removing method of remote field eddy current. Firstly, mathematical morphological filter(MMF) is utilized to eliminate the baseline bias of the defect signal, then a mathematical model based on radial basis function(RBF) is introduced to fit the real peak and pseudo-peak, and the Nelder-Mead simplex method(NMSM) is used to solve the model parameters and obtain the pseudo-peak signal. Simulation experiment and practical data processing results indicate that the proposed method possesses a decent pseudo-peak removing performance and certain applicability. © 2019, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Javierg M., Jaime G.G., Emesto V.S., Non-destructive techniques based on eddy current testing, Sensors, 11, 3, pp. 2525-2565, (2011)
  • [2] Raphael F., Teresa V.C., Jaime V.M., Defect Detection and Segmentation Framework for Remote Field Eddy Current Sensor data, Sensors, 17, 10, pp. 2276-2290, (2017)
  • [3] Miguel A.M., Luis R., Nuno P., Et al., Novel eddy current probes for pipes: Application in austenitic round-in-square profiles of ITER, NDT& E International, 87, pp. 111-118, (2017)
  • [4] Kimh M., Yoo H.R., Park G.S., Analysis of a defect signal deformations induced by eddy current in RFECT system for pipeline inspection, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 55, 11, pp. 1-5, (2018)
  • [5] Zhangw, Shi Y.B., Li Y.J., Et al., A study of quantifying thickness of ferromagnetic pipes based on remote field eddy current testing, Sensors, 18, 9, pp. 2769-2779, (2018)
  • [6] Antipov A.G., Markov A.A., 3D simulation and experiment on high speed rail MFL inspection, NDT& E International, 99, pp. 117-185, (2018)
  • [7] Grimberg R., Udpa L., Savin A., Et al., Remote field eddy current control using rotating magnetic field transducer: Application to pressure tubes examination, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 19, 4, pp. 202-218, (2008)
  • [8] Kobayashi N., Ueno S., Nagai S., Et al., Remote field eddy current testing for steam generator inspection of fast reactor, Nuclear Engineering & Design, 241, 12, pp. 4643-4648, (2011)
  • [9] Kim Y.J., Lee S.S., Eddy current probes of inclined coils for increased detectability of circumferential cracks in tubing, NDT& E International, 49, pp. 77-82, (2012)
  • [10] Xu X., Liu M., Zhang Z., Et al., A novel high sensitivity sensor for remote field eddy current non-destructive testing based on orthogonal magnetic field, Sensors, 14, 12, pp. 24098-24115, (2014)