Effect of cotton cleaning on fiber quality of machine-harvested cotton in Xinjiang region

被引：0
|
作者：
Wu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Tian J. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ]
Xu S. [1 ,2 ]
Zuo W. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang W. [1 ,2 ]
Gou L. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Dong H. [3 ]
Jiu X. [3 ]
Yu Y. [3 ]
Zhao Z. [4 ]
机构：
[1] College of Agronomy, Shihezi University, Shihezi
[2] Key Laboratory of Oasis Eco-Agriculture, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi
[3] Division Eight of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi
[4] Division One of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Alaer
来源：
Fangzhi Xuebao/Journal of Textile Research | 2021年 / 42卷 / 11期
关键词：
Cotton cleaning; Cotton in Xinjiang; Fiber damage; Fiber quality; Machine-harvested cotton;
D O I：
10.13475/j.fzxb.20210104105
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
To reduce the fiber quality damage caused by machine-harvesting and cleaning processes, the relationship between fiber quality and levels of cleaning were comparatively analyzed with regards to Xinjiang cotton. The optimum number of cleaning processes for machine-harvested cotton was determined based on minimal fiber damage. The results indicated that each cotton cleaner causes fiber damage, and seed cotton cleanings vary greatly in its effect on fiber strength with the strength reduction of 1.0 cN/tex. The declines during the second and third seed cotton cleanings, are greater than those during the first and fourth cleanings. Lint cleanings significantly reduce the fiber length and length uniformity index by 0.8 mm and 1.7%, and significantly increase short fiber index by 2.0%, and the greatest damage takes place during the first lint cleaning (included ginning). Therefore, differentiated selections of seed cotton cleanings should be adopted based on the level of leaf contamination by using 1 or 2 seed cotton cleaners. Lint cleaning should only use one air-type lint cleaner or this could sometimes be omitted. © 2021, Periodical Agency of Journal of Textile Research. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：24 / 28
页数：4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Xinjiang statistical yearbook, pp. 312-319, (2020)
  • [2] WANG Yan, LIANG Yan, LI Luhua, Analyze of the harvest rate of cotton, Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 38, 11, pp. 12-14, (2015)
  • [3] TIAN Jingshan, Change of fiber quality in machine-harvested cotton in the Xinjiang and further survey of promising approaches for improving, pp. 13-18, (2018)
  • [4] FAULKNER W B, WANJURA J D, BOMAN R K, Et al., Evaluation of modern cotton harvest systems on irrigated cotton: harvester performance, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27, 4, pp. 497-506, (2011)
  • [5] KRIFA M., Fiber length distribution in cotton processing: dominant features and interaction effects, Textile Research Journal, 76, 5, pp. 426-435, (2006)
  • [6] TIAN J S, ZHANG X Y, ZHANG W F, Et al., Leaf adhesiveness affects damage to fiber strength during seed cotton cleaning of machine-harvested cotton, Industrial Crops and Products, 107, pp. 211-216, (2017)
  • [7] LI C, THIBODEAUX D, KNOWLTON A R, Et al., Effect of cleaning treatment and cotton cultivar on cotton fiber and textile yarn quality, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28, 6, pp. 833-840, (2012)
  • [8] WANJURA J D, FANLKNER W B, HOLT G A, Et al., Influence of harvesting and gin cleaning practices on southern high plains cotton quality, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28, 5, pp. 631-641, (2012)
  • [9] ANTHONY W S., Performance characteristics of cotton ginning machinery, Transaction of the ASAE, 33, 4, pp. 1089-1098, (1990)
  • [10] BAKER R V, LAIRD J W., Potentials for improving stick machine performance, Transaction of the ASAE, 25, 1, pp. 198-203, (1982)
12