Mine microseismic events classification based on improved wavelet decomposition and ELM

被引:0
|
作者
Chen Z. [2 ]
Ding L. [1 ,3 ]
Luo H. [2 ]
Song B. [2 ]
Zhang M. [1 ]
Pan Y. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Xinwen Mining Group Co., Ltd., Xintai
[2] School of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang
[3] School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[4] School of Environment, Liaoning University, Shenyang
来源
Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society | 2020年 / 45卷
关键词
ELM; Identify methods; Mine microseismic event; Threshold function; Wavelet denoising;
D O I
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.0373
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The widely used mine micro-seismic monitoring system generates a large number of micro-seismic signals and has a variety of complex background noise disturbances, making it difficult to identify mine micros-eismic events.However, the existing identification methods have problems such as low noise reduction efficiency, obvious delay, and poor accuracy.In the process of wavelet decomposition, the wavelet threshold and wavelet decomposition level are determined firstly, and then the wavelet coefficients are quantized by using the improved wavelet threshold function to get the optimized wavelet coefficients.Finally, the wavelet coefficients are reconstructed to get the de-noising signal.This method effectively improves the current soft and hard threshold function of the existence of pseudo Gibbs phenomenon and discontinuity, large error defects.Secondly, the characteristics of the de-noised micro-seismic signal are extracted and the number of nodes in the ELM hidden layer is trained, and the improved ELM solves the problem that the number of nodes in the hidden layer could not be correctly selected in the training data using traditional ELM, which improves the identification accuracy of micro-seismic events.Finally, the improved ultimate learning machine can identify mine micro-seismic events more effectively.The results show that the classification accuracy of the mine microseismic event recognition method based on improved wavelet decomposition and ELM is 91.1%, which verifies the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method, and the method can further improve the identification accuracy by adding micro-seismic signal data. © 2020, Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 648
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] ZHAO Yanhong, BAO Jinzhe, WANG Shubo, Et al., Identification and analysis of molybdenum mine microseismic events based on waveform features-a case study of zhuozishan molybdenum mine, Seismic Disaster Prevention Technology, 14, 3, pp. 662-676, (2019)
  • [2] ZHAO Yixin, JIANG Yaodong, WANG Tao, Et al., Features of microseismic events and precursors of rock burst in underground coal mining with hardroof, Journal of China Coal Society, 37, 12, pp. 1960-1966, (2012)
  • [3] JIANG Wenwu, YANG Zuolin, XIE Jianmin, Et al., Application of FFT spectrum analysis in identification of microseismic signals, Journal of Science and Technology, 33, 2, pp. 86-90, (2015)
  • [4] WEI Zhiguo, Research and application of SOS microseismic monitoring system in deep high-stress rock burst working face, Shandong Coal Science and Technology, 1, pp. 79-81, (2017)
  • [5] ZHU Shangsong, Research and development of KJ699 microseismic monitoring system based on multi-substation, Industry and Mine Automation, 41, 5, pp. 13-18, (2015)
  • [6] DENG Zhigang, QI Qingxin, ZHAO Shankun, Et al., Application of self-seismic microseismic monitoring technology in coal mine dynamic disaster warning, Coal Science and Technology, 44, 7, pp. 92-96, (2016)
  • [7] JIANG Fuxing, YIN Yongming, ZHU Quanjie, Et al., Feature extraction and classification of mining microseismic waveforms via multi-channels analysis, Journal of China Coal Society, 39, 2, pp. 229-237, (2014)
  • [8] HUA W, MENG L, SHANG X., Current developments on micro-seismic data processing[J], Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 32, pp. 521-537, (2016)
  • [9] CHING A C T, GLASER S D., Microseismic source deconvolut-ion:Wiener filter versus minimax, fourier versus wavelets, and linear versus nonlinear[J], The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, pp. 3048-3058, (2004)
  • [10] GONG Yue, JIA Ruisheng, LU Xinming, Et al., Suppression of random noise in microseismic signals by empirical mode decomposition and wavelet transform, Acta Coal Sinica Sinica, 43, 11, pp. 3247-3256, (2008)