Joint Interaction Between Distributed Power Trading and Distribution Network Operation Considering Dynamic Network Tariffs

被引:0
|
作者
Wang B. [1 ]
Wu W. [2 ]
Zhang T. [1 ]
Wang H. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] The College of Software Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[3] Hefei Electric Power Supply Company, State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co., Ltd., Hefei
关键词
distribution network operation; dynamic network tariff; joint interaction; peer-to-peer (P2P) trading;
D O I
10.7500/AEPS20221024005
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the growth of the installed scale of distributed energy under the goals of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality, the number and scale of peer-to-peer (P2P) for distributed power trading will keep increasing. By establishing a short-term network tariff model and dynamic adjustment mechanism for long-term interactive operation of distributed trading and distribution networks, this paper aims to effectively promote the transformation of the operation and cost recovery methods of distribution networks under the new energy structure. First, based on the additional short-term operation costs of P2P trading on the grid, this paper establishes a P2P trading network tariff model with three parts: line occupation cost, voltage adjustment cost and network loss cost, and adopts continuous two-way auction to match the trading aggregation for P2P trading with small volume, high frequency and real-time characteristics, and then further designs a dynamic network tariff update and adjustment model considering line utilization and incremental cost. At the same time, a quotation and quantity strategy adjustment model for electricity purchasing and selling users participating in P2P trading has been established. Based on the Vensim DSS platform and MATLAB software, a long time-scale joint interaction simulation is conducted. The case analysis shows that the proposed dynamic network tariff can release stronger price signals to stimulate the power flow distribution of P2P trading on the less utilized lines, while discouraging the higher utilized lines from generating more net power flow increments to achieve the effect of“low promotion and high suppression”and realize the effective utilization of network assets. Moreover, network tariff charging will not harm users’enthusiasm to participate in P2P trading for a long period of time in the future. Therefore, it can promote the benign synergistic development of distributed trading and distribution network, and realize the win-win situation of distribution network users and public distribution network operators. © 2023 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Notice on the pilot market-based trading of distributed power generation[EB/OL]
  • [2] Supplementary notice on the pilot market-based trading of distributed power generation[EB/OL]
  • [3] YAO Haotian, XIANG Yue, LIU Junyong, Multi-agent collaborative planning method for distributed generators based on dynamic updating of network tariffs[J], Automation of Electric Power Systems, 45, 17, pp. 70-78, (2021)
  • [4] SHI Fangdi, LIU Dunnan, YU Tao, Et al., Probe into mechanism of use of system charge in distributed trading adapted to photovoltaic learning curve[J], Smart Power, 48, 3, pp. 96-103, (2020)
  • [5] WU Zhiguo, LIU Jichun, ZHANG Shuai, Et al., Peer-to-peer transaction model of multiple power sellers and its dynamic network fee mechanism [J], Automation of Electric Power Systems, 45, 19, pp. 100-108, (2021)
  • [6] VERBIC G., Decentralized P2P energy trading under network constraints in a low-voltage network[J], IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10, 5, pp. 5163-5173, (2019)
  • [7] GOFF LATIMIER R,, Et al., Exogenous cost allocation in peer-to-peer electricity markets[J], IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34, 4, pp. 2553-2564, (2019)
  • [8] CHEN Y C,, DOMINGUEZ-GARCIA A D,, SAUER P W., Measurement-based estimation of linear sensitivity distribution factors and applications [J], IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29, 3, pp. 1372-1382, (2014)
  • [9] OLLENBERG B F,, SHEBLE G B., Power generation, operation, and control[M], (2013)
  • [10] CONEJO A J,, GALIANA F D,, KOCKAR I., Z-bus loss allocation[J], IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16, 1, pp. 105-110, (2001)