Impact of recycling rate regulation bsaed on design for disassembly

被引：0
|
作者：
Chen Y. [1 ]
Li B. [1 ]
Bai Q. [2 ,3 ]
Chen X. [1 ]
Tang J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao
[3] Institute of Operations Research, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao
来源：
Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS | 2019年 / 25卷 / 07期
关键词：
Design for disassembly; Due diligence patterns; Recycling rate regulation; Remanufacturing; Social welfare;
D O I：
10.13196/j.cims.2019.07.022
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Due to the rapid increase of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in recent years, the government regulates the enterprise's production decisions through recycling rate regulation. Based on the product design for disassembly, the choice of due diligence patterns under recycling rate regulation was researched. The mode of achieving due diligence facing more stringent recycling target was explired, and the impact of regulatory target on social welfare including producer profit, consumer surplus and environment was found. Numerical experiment was used to validate theoretical results. The result showed that the producer had three kinds of due diligence patterns, and the thresholds were found between them. Facing more stringent recycling target, producer would achieve due diligence by increasing the investment on design for disassembly, the quantity of new products and the quantity of remanufactured products; with the increase of regulation target, the profit of producer decreased, while consumer surplus and environmental impact increased in some conditions. © 2019, Editorial Department of CIMS. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1817 / 1827
页数：10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Esenduran G., Kemahlioglu Z.E., Seaminathan J.M., Take-back legislation: consequences for remanufacturing and environment, Decision Sciences, 47, 2, pp. 219-256, (2016)
  • [2] State council on the issuance of extended producer responsibility system implementation plan, Resource Recycling, 12, pp. 42-45, (2016)
  • [3] Cao X., Zheng B., Wen H., Joint decision of production and pricing for remanufacturing system based on DFD theory, Journal of Management Engineering, 1, pp. 117-123, (2016)
  • [4] Gao J., Liu X., Teng J., Decision-making of remanufacturing considering product disassemblality, Systems Engineering, 1, pp. 110-118, (2017)
  • [5] Raz G., Souza G.C., Recycling as a strategic supply source, Production and Operations Management, 27, 5, pp. 902-916, (2018)
  • [6] Reimann M., Xiong Y., Zhou Y., Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing, European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 2, pp. 510-518, (2019)
  • [7] Chen Y., Li B., Bai Q., Et al., Research on production and emission reduction investment decisions of the remanufacturing enterprise under carbon trading environment
  • [8] Wang Z., Li B., Liu Z., Et al., Research on impact of government regulation on closed-loop supply chain with dual responsibilities and dual channels, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 23, 10, pp. 2260-2268, (2017)
  • [9] Chen Y.Y., Li B.Y., Bai Q.G., Et al., Decision-making and environmental implications under cap-and-trade and take-back regulations, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 4, (2018)
  • [10] Esenduran G., Kemahlloglu-Ziya E., Swaminathan J.M., Impact of take-back regulation on the remanufacturing industry, Production and Operations Management, 26, 5, pp. 924-944, (2017)
123