Image mosaic tampering detection based on deep learning

被引:0
|
作者
Bian L. [1 ]
Luo X. [2 ]
Li S. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing
[2] School of Information Technology and Network Security, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing
关键词
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Deep learning; Exponential Linear Unit (ELU); Image mosaic forensics; Loss function;
D O I
10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0583
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional image stitching detection algorithm manually constructs the stitching features by researchers. With the advancement of technology and the continuous development of image processing technology, the limitations of the features of manual construction, such as weak robustness and difficult positioning, are gradually manifested. Aimed at this kind of problem, this paper proposes to construct a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) by means of fixed pre-convolution kernel, and detect the image tampering area by feature self-learning. Through experiments and research, it is found that the features of the mosaic tampering area of the spliced tamper image can be learned by the CNN model. Prior to the CNN model, the convolution kernel uses a high-pass filter and the activation function uses an Exponential Linear Unit (ELU), which makes the CNN model be capable of identifying features such as splicing and tampering with image edge traces. The detection results show that the positioning accuracy for the falsification image's tampering area is 84.3% in the IEEE IFS-TC image forensics training set and the detection true negative rate of the tampering area is 96.18%. © 2020, Editorial Board of JBUAA. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1044
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Haghighi B.B., Taherinia A.H., Mohajerzadeh A.H., TRLG: Fragile blind quad watermarking for image tamper detection and recovery by providing compact digests with optimized quality using LWT and GA, Information Sciences, 486, pp. 204-230, (2019)
  • [2] Li Y., Zhong L., Li J., Detection of image splicing forgery based on LBP and co-occurrence matrix, Journal of Wuhan University(Natural Science Edition), 61, 6, pp. 517-524, (2015)
  • [3] Luo W., Qu Z., Huang J., Et al., A novel method for detecting cropped and recompressed image block, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 217-220, (2007)
  • [4] Swaminathan A., Wu M., Liu K.J.R., Component forensics of digital cameras: A non-intrusive approach, 200640th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 1194-1199, (2007)
  • [5] Zhang Q., Lu W., Wang R., Et al., Digital image splicing detection based on Markov features in block DWT domain, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77, 23, pp. 31239-31260, (2018)
  • [6] Kang X., Li Y., Qu Z., Et al., Enhancing source camera identification performance with a camera reference phase sensor pattern noise, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 7, 2, pp. 393-402, (2012)
  • [7] Zeng H., Zhan Y., Kang X., Et al., Image splicing localization using PCA-based noise level estimation, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 4, pp. 4783-4799, (2017)
  • [8] Yao H., Wang S., Zhang X., Et al., Detecting image splicing based on noise level inconsistency, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 10, pp. 12457-12479, (2017)
  • [9] Han J.G., Park T.H., Moon Y.H., Et al., Quantization-based Markov feature extraction method for image splicing detection, Machine Vision and Applications, 29, 3, pp. 543-552, (2018)
  • [10] Belferdi W., Behloul A., Noui L., A Bayer pattern-based fragile watermarking scheme for color image tamper detection and restoration, Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 30, 3, pp. 1093-1112, (2019)