Effect of Surface Micromorphology on the Deformation and Bonding Quality of Stainless Steel/Carbon Steel during Hot Isostatic Pressing

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang B. [1 ]
Li S. [1 ]
Zhang Q. [1 ]
Liu J. [1 ]
Zhang L. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing
关键词
AISI304 stainless steel/Q235A carbon steel; Bonding quality; Geometric characteristics of contact interface; Hot isostatic pressing; Surface micromorphology;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2019.10.062
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surface morphology is an important factor affecting the interface deformation behavior and bonding quality of bimetals during deformation bonding process. In order to study the deformation laws of different surface micromorphology and its effect on the bonding quality during deformation bonding process, three kinds of AISI 304 stainless steel and Q235A carbon steel cylindrical specimen with different surface micromorphology are prepared by turning. After bonding the two kinds of metal in vacuum, the interfacial bonding quality of composites are characterized by tensile failure strength and interfacial bonding rate and the geometrical characteristics of the contact interface contour are analyzed by microscopic observation. Based on the commercial finite element software, the deformation process of the surface roughness peak during the deformation process is simulated and analyzed. The results show that the surface roughness has a significant effect on the deformation and bonding quality of the interface. The deformation forms of rough peaks of stainless steel and carbon steel are different during the static pressure composite process. The rough peaks of harder stainless steel are embedded in the carbon steel almost without deformation, while the rough peaks of softer carbon steel are obviously flattened. As the roughness of stainless steel increases and the roughness of carbon steel decreases, the relative sliding of the metal on both sides of the interface decreases and the contact pressure per unit area increases because of the pinning of the surface roughness of the stainless steel surface to the surface of the carbon steel, resulting in the improve of interfacial bonding quality. © 2019 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Wang D., Xiu S., Effect of bonding temperature on the interfacial microstructure and performance of mild steel/Austenite stainless steel diffusion-bonded joint, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 53, 5, pp. 567-574, (2017)
  • [2] Knezevic M., Jahedi M., Korkolis Y.P., Et al., Material-based design of the extrusion of bimetallic tubes, Computational Materials Science, 95, pp. 63-73, (2014)
  • [3] Luo Z.A., Wang G.L., Xie G.M., Et al., Interfacial microstructure and properties of a vacuum hot roll-bonded titanium-stainless steel clad plate with a niobium interlayer, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 26, 6, pp. 754-760, (2013)
  • [4] Zu G., Li H., Li B., Et al., Effect of high-frequency current heating online process on microstructures and mechanical property of stainless steel/carbon steel cladding strip, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 43, 10, pp. 1048-1052, (2007)
  • [5] Chen L., Yang Z., Jha B., Et al., Clad metals, roll bonding and their applications for SOFC interconnects, Journal of Power Sources, 152, 1, pp. 40-45, (2005)
  • [6] Rong J.H., Hong X., Xiang G.Y., Et al., Research on finishing rolling force model for hot rolling wide and heavy stainless steel clad sheets, Applied Mechanics & Materials, 488, pp. 213-216, (2014)
  • [7] Kas Y.O., Kaynak C., Ultrasonic (C-scan) and microscopic evaluation of resin transfer molded epoxy composite plates, Polymer Testing, 24, 1, pp. 114-120, (2005)
  • [8] Wang A., Ohashi O., Ueno K., Effect of surface asperity on diffusion bonding, Materials Transactions, 47, pp. 179-184, (2006)
  • [9] Zhang G., Chandel R.S., Effect of surface roughness on the diffusion bonding of Incoloy MA 956, Journal of Materials Science, 40, 7, pp. 1793-1796, (2005)
  • [10] Wang Z.C., Ridley N., Lorimer G.W., Et al., Evaluation of diffusion bonds formed between superplastic sheet materials, Journal of Materials Science, 31, 19, pp. 5199-5206, (1996)