A comparative study on the alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste

被引:0
|
作者
Jey-R Sabado Ventura
Jehoon Lee
Deokjin Jahng
机构
[1] DepartmentofEnvironmentalEngineeringandEnergy,MyongjiUniversity
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two stage anaerobic digestion(AD) process was conducted. The temperature of the acidogenic(A) and methanogenic(M) reactors was controlled as follows: System 1(S1) mesophilic A-mesophilic M;(S2) mesophilic A-thermophilic M; and(S3)thermophilic A-mesophilic M. Initially, the AD reactor was acclimatized and inoculated with digester sludge. Food waste was added with the soluble chemical oxygen demand(SCOD) concentrations of41.4–47.0 g/L and volatile fatty acids of 2.0–3.2 g/L. Based on the results, the highest total chemical oxygen demand removal(86.6%) was recorded in S2 while S3 exhibited the highest SCOD removal(96.6%). Comparing S1 with S2, total solids removal increased by 0.5%; S3 on the other hand decreased by 0.1 % as compared to S1. However, volatile solids(VS) removal in S1, S2, and S3was 78.5%, 81.7%, and 79.2%, respectively. S2 also exhibited the highest CH4 content, yield, and production rate of 70.7%, 0.44 L CH4/g VSadded, and 1.23 L CH4/(L·day), respectively. Bacterial community structure revealed that the richness, diversity, evenness, and dominance of S2 were high except for the archaeal community. The terminal restriction fragments dendrogram also revealed that the microbial community of the acidogenic and methanogenic reactors in S2 was distinct. Therefore,S2 was the best among the systems for the operation of two-stage AD of food waste in terms of CH4production, nutrient removal, and microbial community structure.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study on the alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Ventura, Jey-R Sabado
    Lee, Jehoon
    Jahng, Deokjin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 26 (06) : 1274 - 1283
  • [2] A comparative study on the alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Jey-R Sabado Ventura
    Jehoon Lee
    Deokjin Jahng
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, (06) : 1274 - 1283
  • [3] Thermophilic and mesophilic (two-stage) anaerobic digestion
    Dichtl, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 11 (02): : 98 - 104
  • [4] Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Roberts, R
    Davies, WJ
    Forster, CF
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1999, 77 (B2) : 93 - 97
  • [5] A study of two-stage anaerobic digestion of solid potato waste using reactors under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions
    Parawira, W.
    Murto, M.
    Read, J. S.
    Mattiasson, B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 28 (11) : 1205 - 1216
  • [6] Biogas Production and Energy Balance in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Thermophilic versus Mesophilic
    Dinh, Pham Van
    Fujiwara, Takeshi
    [J]. FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2023, 9 (07):
  • [7] Two-stage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Comparison to conventional single-stage mesophilic process
    Rusin, Jiri
    Chamradova, Katerina
    Basinas, Panagiotis
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 119 : 172 - 182
  • [8] Bioenergy recovery from two-stage mesophilic- thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cheese whey
    Kovalev, A. A.
    Mikheeva, E. R.
    Katraeva, I. V.
    Kovalev, D. A.
    Kozlov, A. M.
    Litti, Yu., V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (12) : 4676 - 4685
  • [9] Two-stage thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge-from a biological nutrient removal plant
    Watts, S.
    Hamilton, G.
    Keller, J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (08) : 149 - 157
  • [10] Critical considerations in two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste - A review
    Srisowmeya, G.
    Chakravarthy, M.
    Devi, G. Nandhini
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 119