Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis therapies: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Ting, Ryan [1 ]
Borkum, Megan [2 ,3 ]
Ni, Lian Ting [2 ]
Levin, Adeera [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Div Nephrol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] BC Renal, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL | 2025年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
patient screening; hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; dialysis modality; home dialysis; PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS; SELF-CARE; BARRIERS; SELECTION; MODALITY;
D O I
10.1177/08968608241266130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Home dialysis therapies have limited uptake in most regions despite recognized benefits such as increasing patients' independence, and several domains of quality of life with cost savings in some systems. Objective: To perform a scoping review of published literature to identify tools and guides used in systematically screening and assessing patient suitability for home dialysis. A secondary objective was to explore barriers and enablers associated with the home dialysis assessment process. It is important to identify gaps in current research to pose pertinent questions for future work in the field. Design: Online databases Embase, Medline (Ovid), and CINAHL were used to identify articles published between January 2007 to May 2023. A total of 23 peer-reviewed primary and secondary studies that investigated screening or selection for patients > 18 years old with kidney failure for home dialysis met the study inclusion criteria. Results: The studies consisted of secondary studies (n= 10), observational studies (n = 8), and survey-based studies (n = 5). The major themes identified that influence patient screening and assessment for home dialysis candidacy included: screening tools and guidelines (n = 8), relative contraindications (n = 4), patient or program education (n = 9), and socioeconomic factors (n= 2). Limitations: Consistent with the scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. The possible omission of evidence in languages other than English is a limitation. Conclusion: This scoping review identified tools and factors that potentially guide the assessment process for home dialysis candidacy. Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis requires a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, psychosocial, and logistical factors. Further research is required to validate and refine existing tools to establish standardized patient screening criteria and evaluation processes. Up-to-date training and education for healthcare providers and patients are needed to improve the utilization of home dialysis and ensure optimal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers to Home Dialysis: A Scoping Review
    Sauve, Caroline
    Vandyk, Amanda Digel
    Bourbonnais, Frances Fothergill
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2016, 43 (04) : 295 - 308
  • [2] Home dialysis therapies
    Corbett, Richard W.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (03) : 259 - 261
  • [3] Home dialysis therapies
    Harwood, Lori
    Leitch, Rosemary
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2006, 33 (01) : 46 - +
  • [4] Screening of Cognitive Impairment in the Dialysis Population: A Scoping Review
    San, Aye
    Hiremagalur, Balaji
    Muircroft, Wendy
    Grealish, Laurie
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 44 (3-4) : 182 - 195
  • [5] The resurgence of home dialysis therapies
    Moran, John
    ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2007, 14 (03) : 284 - 289
  • [6] Telehealth for Home Dialysis Therapies
    Patterson, Patricia
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2017, 44 (06) : 545 - +
  • [7] BARRIERS TO HOME DIALYSIS THERAPIES
    Martin, A.
    Thomson, N.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 18 : 40 - 40
  • [8] A scoping review of patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies
    Macpherson, Karen
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Elston, Lauren
    Myles, Susan
    Washington, Jennifer
    Sungum, Nisha
    Briggs, Mark
    Newsome, Philip
    Calvert, Melanie
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 16 (11) : 1005 - 1017
  • [9] Instruments for Patient Safety Assessment: A Scoping Review
    Nunes, Elisabete
    Sirtoli, Fernanda
    Lima, Eliane
    Minarini, Greyce
    Gaspar, Filomena
    Lucas, Pedro
    Primo, Candida
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (20)
  • [10] Home Videos for Remote Assessment in Children with Disabilities: A Scoping Review
    Steinhart, Shoshana
    Gilboa, Yafit
    Sinvani, Rachel-Tzofia
    Gefen, Naomi
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024, 30 (06) : e1629 - e1648