Indications, Surgical Strategies And Hearing Outcomes of Revision Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on 2602 Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Tomasoni, Michele [1 ]
Borsetto, Daniele [2 ]
Canzi, Pietro [3 ]
Vural, Alperen [4 ]
Testa, Gabriele [1 ,5 ]
Piazza, Cesare [1 ,5 ]
Pinelli, Lorenzo [6 ]
de Zinis, Luca Oscar Redaelli [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] ASST Spedali Civili, Unit Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Brescia, Italy
[2] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept ENT, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Pavia, Fdn IRCCS Policlin San Matteo, Unit Otorhinolaryngol, Pavia, Italy
[4] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Univ Brescia, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Med Specialties Radiol Sci & Publ Hlth, Brescia, Italy
[6] ASST Spedali Civili, Unit Neuroradiol, Brescia, Italy
[7] ASST Spedali Civili, Unit Pediat Otorhinolaryngol, Brescia, Italy
关键词
otosclerosis; recurrent conductive hearing loss; revision stapes surgery; stadedotomy; stapedectomy; GRANULOMA FOLLOWING STAPEDECTOMY; HYDROXYAPATITE BONE-CEMENT; REPARATIVE GRANULOMA; INCUS NECROSIS; LONG PROCESS; ARGON-LASER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OPERATIVE FINDINGS; PROSTHESIS LENGTH; KTP LASER;
D O I
10.1002/ohn.974
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis. Data Sources. The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000. Review Methods. The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- analyses guidelines. We considered original series describing RSS for otosclerosis, reporting postoperative hearing outcomes according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head - Head and Neck Surgery guidelines for conductive hearing loss (CHL) for at least 30 consecutive cases. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled proportion and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis were conducted using random effect models. Results. Nineteen studies were included, for a total of 2602 patients (2735 ears) and 2359 postoperative hearing results. RSS was mostly performed for recurrent CHL with air-bone gap (ABG)>20 dB. Multiple concomitant causes were often present, with prosthesis placement defect and incus necrosis as the most common causes. The pooled proportion of postoperative ABG<10 dB and ABG<20 dB was 57.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8%-61.4%) and 79% (95% CI: 76.0%-81.8%), respectively. Dead ears were 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%2.1%). Compared to primary surgery, RSS had a significantly lower rate of ABG<10 dB (OR =0.36, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.54%; P < .001). Both revision incudostapedotomy with/without incus reconstruction and malleovestibulopexy are viable options with nonsignificant fi cant differences in ABG closure rates (P = .182). Conclusion. RSS is challenging and requires the surgeon to carefully evaluate all potential causes of previous failure and tailor the intervention according to intraoperative findings. In most cases, ABG closure within 20 dB can be achieved with a relatively low risk of dead ears.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 62
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Juvenile otosclerosis and congenital stapes footplate fixation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and management
    Daniel, Andrew
    Budiono, Gideon
    Rao, Amshuman
    Low, Gary K. K.
    Ellis, Matthew Peter
    Lee, Jennifer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [2] Revision stapes surgery - Retrospective analysis of surgical findings in a series of 21 otosclerosis patients
    Durko, Marcin
    Kaczmarczyk, Darlusz
    Durko, Tomasz
    OTOSCLEROSIS AND STAPES SURGERY, 2007, 65 : 273 - +
  • [3] Endoscopic versus microscopic stapes surgery outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Koukkoullis, Alexandros
    Toth, Istvan
    Gede, Noemi
    Szakacs, Zsolt
    Hegyi, Peter
    Varga, Gabor
    Pap, Istvan
    Harmat, Kinga
    Nemeth, Adrienn
    Szanyi, Istvan
    Lujber, Laszlo
    Gerlinger, Imre
    Revesz, Peter
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (08): : 2019 - 2027
  • [4] A Systematic Review of the Effect of Piston Diameter in Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis on Hearing Results
    Wegner, Inge
    Verhagen, Jessica J.
    Stegeman, Inge
    Vincent, Robert
    Grolman, Wilko
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (01): : 182 - 190
  • [5] Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    O'Connor, Michaela
    Steinl, Gabrielle K.
    Padaki, Ajay S.
    Duchman, Kyle R.
    Westermann, Robert W.
    Lynch, T. Sean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (05): : 1254 - 1262
  • [6] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Endoscopic vs Microscopic Stapes Surgery for Stapes Fixation
    Ho, Sandra
    Patel, Prayag
    Ballard, Daniel
    Rosenfeld, Richard
    Chandrasekhar, Sujana
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 165 (05) : 626 - 635
  • [7] A meta-analysis review of revision stapes surgery with argon laser: Effectiveness and safety
    Wiet, RJ
    Kubek, DC
    Lemberg, P
    Byskosh, AT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1997, 18 (02): : 166 - 171
  • [8] Microscopic versus endoscopic stapes surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajiioannou, J.
    Gkrinia, E.
    Tzimkas-Dakis, K.
    Palla, E.
    Brotis, A.
    Korais, C.
    Saratziotis, A.
    Lachanas, V
    Skoulakis, C.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2022, 136 (11): : 1014 - 1022
  • [9] A Meta-analysis of Surgical Success Rates in Congenital Stapes Fixation and Juvenile Otosclerosis
    Asik, Burak
    Binar, Murat
    Serdar, Muhittin
    Satar, Bulent
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (01): : 191 - 198
  • [10] Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    Puchar, Anne
    Vesale, Elie
    Moawad, Gaby
    Darai, Emile
    Roman, Horace
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 453 - 466