Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Assessment of Alveolar Clefts: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Image Quality

被引:5
|
作者
Lemberger, Mathias [1 ,3 ]
Regnstrand, Tobias [2 ]
Karsten, Agneta [1 ]
Benchimol, Daniel [2 ]
Shi, Xie-qi [4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Solna, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Div Oral Diagnost & Rehabil, Solna, Sweden
[3] Eastmaninst, Eastmaninstitutet, Folktandvarden Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Dent, Bergen, Norway
关键词
LIP;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010588
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Children born with an alveolar cleft receive bone grafts for improved function and aesthetics. The cleft area is examined radiologically before and after bone graft. Optimizing radiographic examination protocols is essential to protect these patients from possible delayed radiation injury later in life. This study investigates whether image quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exposed with an ultra-low-dose (ULD) protocol is comparable to the clinical default protocol, the standard dose (SD) protocol, in visualizing details of importance in bone grafting of alveolar clefts.Methods:In this randomized controlled study, 72 patients with unilateral or bilateral alveolar clefts between 9 and 19 years (mean age, 9.5 years) were randomized 1:1 with either a ULD or an SD CBCT examination protocol. The CBCT scans were conducted with a Planmeca ProMax Mid scanner with an 8 x 5-cm field of view. Two experienced radiologists blindly evaluated the images and visibility of cortical bone border, trabecular bone, tooth anatomy, root development, periodontal space, and cleft width. The visibility was categorized as unacceptable, acceptable, or excellent.Results:Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant differences in structure visibility between ULD and SD protocols regarding anatomical structures of interest: cortical bone border (P = 0.07), trabecular bone (P = 0.64), tooth anatomy (P = 0.09), root development (P = 0.57), periodontal space (P = 0.38), and cleft width (P = 0.44).Conclusions:ULD and standard CBCT protocols provide comparable image quality in terms of structure visibility in the examination of alveolar clefts. The ULD protocol is preferred to the SD protocol because of the lower radiation dose without compromising diagnostic information of CBCT images.CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Diagnostic, I.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 903
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image quality assessment of low-dose protocols in cone beam computed tomography of the anterior maxilla
    Ihlis, Randi Lynds
    Kadesjo, Nils
    Tsilingaridis, Georgios
    Benchimol, Daniel
    Shi, Xie Qi
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 133 (04): : 483 - 491
  • [2] Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial
    Reidelbach, Carolin S.
    Neubauer, Claudia
    Geissler, Ann-Kristin H.
    Lampert, Florian
    Zajonc, Horst
    Simunovic, Filip
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Kotter, Elmar
    Goerke, Sebastian M.
    Neubauer, Jakob
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [3] Assessment of image quality in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography imaging
    Gamache, Casey
    English, Jeryl D.
    Salas-Lopez, Anna M.
    Rong, John
    Akyalcin, Sercan
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 21 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [4] Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dose optimization technique and image quality assessment scoring
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    Singh, Pushpendra P.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Singh, Ranjit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [5] Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study
    Horsch, Laura
    Labis, Christos
    Trebing, Charlotte Theresa
    Kronsteiner, Dorothea
    Hilgenfeld, Tim
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 112
  • [6] Low-dose computed tomography perceptual image quality assessment
    Lee, Wonkyeong
    Wagner, Fabian
    Galdran, Adrian
    Shi, Yongyi
    Xia, Wenjun
    Wang, Ge
    Mou, Xuanqin
    Ahamed, Md. Atik
    Imran, Abdullah Al Zubaer
    Oh, Ji Eun
    Kim, Kyungsang
    Baek, Jong Tak
    Lee, Dongheon
    Hong, Boohwi
    Tempelman, Philip
    Lyu, Donghang
    Kuiper, Adrian
    van Blokland, Lars
    Calisto, Maria Baldeon
    Hsieh, Scott
    Han, Minah
    Baek, Jongduk
    Maier, Andreas
    Wang, Adam
    Gold, Garry Evan
    Choi, Jang-Hwan
    [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2025, 99
  • [7] Dose and Image Quality of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as Compared With Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography in Abdominal Imaging
    Schegerer, Alexander A.
    Lechel, Ursula
    Ritter, Manuel
    Weisser, Gerald
    Fink, Christian
    Brix, Gunnar
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (10) : 675 - 684
  • [8] Recent Development of Low-dose X-ray Cone-beam Computed Tomography
    Wang, Jing
    Liang, Zhengrong
    Lu, Hongbing
    Xing, Lei
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 6 (02) : 72 - 81
  • [9] Tilting the jaw to improve the image quality or to reduce the dose in cone-beam computed tomography
    Luckow, Marlen
    Deyhle, Hans
    Beckmann, Felix
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea
    Mueller, Bert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (03) : E389 - E393
  • [10] Advances in Imaging (Intraop Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Synthetic Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, Low-Dose Protocols)
    Jankowski, Pawel P.
    Chan, Justin P.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 35 (02) : 161 - 172