Comparison Between REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 for Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

被引:4
|
作者
Sahay, Sandeep [1 ]
Hernandez, Nelson Villasmil [2 ]
Wang, Fredrick [3 ]
Wooten, Matthew [3 ]
Nguyen, Duc T. [4 ]
Fauvel, Charles [5 ]
Benza, Raymond [6 ]
Graviss, Edward A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Houston Methodist Res Inst, Dept Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Sch Med, Bryan, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Rouen Univ Hosp, Rouen, France
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Houston Med Res Inst, Dept Pathol & Genom Med, Houston, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COMPERA; 2.0; four-strata; pulmonary arterial hypertension; REVEAL Lite 2; risk discrimination; risk score; risk stratification; survival; three-strata;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.052
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification is the cornerstone of the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Current European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) three-strata risk model at baseline and the COMPERA 2.0 four-strata model at follow-up. However, the guidelines did not take into consideration other available risk scores such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long- Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) Lite 2. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is REVEAL Lite 2 better at discriminating risk than the COMPERA risk assessment models at baseline or follow-up evaluations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study analyzed data from patients with PAH consecutively enrolled between June 2011 and February 2022 in the PAH registry at our expert Pulmonary Hypertension Center. Patients were stratified according to REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA three- and four-strata risk scores at baseline and follow-up to predict the composite outcome for lung transplantation or death. Receiver-operating characteristic curves in predicting the binary outcome at 3, 5, and 7 years were plotted. Areas under the curve of the scores were compared by using the c2 test. The performance of the scores was determined according to the Harrel C statistic. RESULTS: A total of 296 patients were included for baseline and 196 for follow-up evaluation. The overall transplant-free survival in the patient population at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was 93.6%, 81.3%, 75.1%, and 68.8%, respectively. At baseline, the C statistic of REVEAL Lite 2 was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), compared with 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.74) for the COMPERA four-strata model and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69) for the COMPERA three-strata model. All C statistic differences between REVEAL Lite 2 and the other models were statistically significant at baseline. INTERPRETATION: Our analysis showed that REVEAL Lite 2 was better at baseline at discriminating risk in this patient population. Future guidelines should consider including REVEAL Lite 2 in the management algorithm to help clinicians make informed decisions. Further analysis in larger cohorts could help validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 387
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between REVEAL Lite 2.0 and COMPERA 2.0 for risk stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Sahay, Sandeep
    Villasmil-Hernandez, Nelson
    Wang, Frederick
    Wooten, Matthew
    Duc Nguyen
    Benza, Raymond
    Graviss, Edward
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [2] Application of REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 risk scores to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension switching to riociguat in the REPLACE study
    Benza, Raymond L.
    Simonneau, Gerald
    Ghofrani, Hossein-Ardeschir
    Corris, Paul A.
    Langleben, David
    Rosenkranz, Stephan
    White, R. James
    Cheng, Chin-Chang
    Campos, Frederico T. A. Figueiredo
    Kim, Hyung-Kwan
    Souza, Rogerio
    Chang, Mikyung
    Rahner, Claudia
    Meier, Christian
    Hoeper, Marius M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (10): : 1756 - 1760
  • [3] Change in REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 risk status in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension initiating oral treprostinil on dual background therapy: a retrospective chart review
    Frantz, R. P.
    Shlobin, O. A.
    Raina, A.
    Wu, B.
    Broderick, M.
    Classi, P.
    Sketch, M. R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 1919 - 1919
  • [4] COMPERA 2.0 risk stratification in medically managed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
    Stubbs, Harrison
    Lua, Stephanie
    Brewis, Melanie
    Johnson, Martin
    Church, Colin
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (03)
  • [5] Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Benza, Raymond L.
    Kanwar, Manreet K.
    Raina, Amresh
    Scott, Jacqueline V.
    Zhao, Carol L.
    Selej, Mona
    Elliott, C. Greg
    Farber, Harrison W.
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (01) : 337 - 346
  • [6] Risk stratification and response to therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and comorbidities: A COMPERA analysis
    Rosenkranz, Stephan
    Pausch, Christine
    Coghlan, John G.
    Huscher, Doerte
    Pittrow, David
    Gruenig, Ekkehard
    Staehler, Gerd
    Vizza, Carmine Dario
    Gall, Henning
    Distler, Oliver
    Delcroix, Marion
    Ghofrani, Hossain A.
    Ewert, Ralf
    Kabitz, Han -Joachim
    Skowasch, Dirk
    Behr, Juergen
    Milger, Katrin
    Halank, Michael
    Wilkens, Heinrike
    Seyfarth, Hans-Juergen
    Held, Matthias
    Scelsi, Laura
    Neurohr, Claus
    Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
    Ulrich, Silvia
    Klose, Hans
    Claussen, Martin
    Eisenmann, Stephan
    Schmidt, Kai-Helge
    Remppis, Bjoern Andrew
    Skride, Andris
    Jureviciene, Elena
    Gumbiene, Lina
    Miliauskas, Skaidrius
    Loeffler-Ragg, Judith
    Lange, Tobias J.
    Olsson, Karen M.
    Hoeper, Marius M.
    Opitz, Christian
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (01): : 102 - 114
  • [7] COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension
    Hoeper, Marius M.
    Pausch, Christine
    Olsson, Karen M.
    Huscher, Doerte
    Pittrow, David
    Gruenig, Ekkehard
    Staehler, Gerd
    Vizza, Carmine Dario
    Gall, Henning
    Distler, Oliver
    Opitz, Christian
    Gibbs, J. Simon R.
    Delcroix, Marion
    Ghofrani, H. Ardeschir
    Park, Da-Hee
    Ewert, Ralf
    Kaemmerer, Harald
    Kabitz, Hans-Joachim
    Skowasch, Dirk
    Behr, Juergen
    Milger, Katrin
    Halank, Michael
    Wilkens, Heinrike
    Seyfarth, Hans-Juergen
    Held, Matthias
    Dumitrescu, Daniel
    Tsangaris, Iraklis
    Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
    Ulrich, Silvia
    Klose, Hans
    Claussen, Martin
    Lange, Tobias J.
    Rosenkranz, Stephan
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (01)
  • [8] E-REVEAL Lite 2.0 scoring for early prediction of disease progression in pulmonary arterial hypertension
    Sahay, Sandeep
    Bhatt, Jiken
    Beshay, Sarah
    Guha, Ashrith
    Nguyen, Duc T.
    Graviss, Edward A.
    Nagueh, Sherif F.
    PULMONARY CIRCULATION, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] The Pursuit of Risk Assessment and Stratification Tools in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Have We Seen the Lite?
    Ford, H. James
    LeVarge, Barbara
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (01) : 14 - 16
  • [10] Comparison of Risk Discrimination Between the REVEAL 2.0 Calculators, the French Pulmonary Registry Algorithm and the Bologna Method in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
    Benza, R. L.
    Kanwar, M.
    Raina, A.
    Lohmueller, L.
    Pasta, D. J.
    La, R.
    Elliott, C. G.
    Farber, H. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199