Review of in vitro studies evaluating respiratory toxicity of aerosols: impact of cell types, chemical composition, and atmospheric processing

被引:0
|
作者
Salana, Sudheer [1 ]
Verma, Vishal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; LUNG EPITHELIAL-CELLS; AMBIENT PARTICULATE MATTER; PEARL RIVER DELTA; OXIDATIVE STRESS; AIR-POLLUTION; DNA-DAMAGE; ALVEOLAR MACROPHAGES; GENE-EXPRESSION; PARTICLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1039/d4em00475b
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In recent decades, several cell-based and acellular methods have been developed to evaluate ambient particulate matter (PM) toxicity. Although cell-based methods provide a more comprehensive assessment of PM toxicity, their results are difficult to comprehend due to the diversity in cellular endpoints, cell types, and assays and the interference of PM chemical components with some of the assays' techniques. In this review, we attempt to clarify some of these issues. We first discuss the morphological and immunological differences among various macrophage and epithelial cells, belonging to the respiratory systems of human and murine species, used in the in vitro studies evaluating PM toxicity. Then, we review the current state of knowledge on the role of different PM chemical components and the relevance of atmospheric processing and aging of aerosols in the respiratory toxicity of PM. Our review demonstrates the need to adopt more physiologically relevant cellular models such as epithelial (or endothelial) cells instead of macrophages for oxidative stress measurement. We suggest limiting macrophages for investigating other cellular responses (e.g., phagocytosis, inflammation, and DNA damage). Unlike monocultures (of macrophages and epithelial cells), which are generally used to study the direct effects of PM on a given cell type, the use of co-culture systems should be encouraged to investigate a more comprehensive effect of PM in the presence of other cells. Our review has identified two major groups of toxic PM chemical species from the existing literature, i.e., metals (Fe, Cu, Mn, Cr, Ni, and Zn) and organic compounds (PAHs, ketones, aliphatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons, and quinones). However, the relative toxicities of these species are still a matter of debate. Finally, the results of the existing studies investigating the effect of aging on PM toxicity are ambiguous, with varying results due to different cell types, different aging conditions, and the presence/absence of specific oxidants. More systematic studies are necessary to understand the role of different SOA precursors, interactions between different PM components, and aging conditions in the overall toxicity of PM. We anticipate that our review will guide future investigations by helping researchers choose appropriate cell models, resulting in a more meaningful interpretation of cell-based assays and thus ultimately leading to a better understanding of the health effects of PM exposure.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols over the Indian Ocean: impact of continental advection
    Nair, PR
    Parameswaran, K
    Sunilkumar, SV
    Abraham, A
    Jacob, S
    TRACE CONSTITUENTS IN THE TROPOSPHERE AND LOWER STRATOSPHERE, 2004, 34 (04): : 828 - 832
  • [2] Effects of atmospheric aging processes on in vitro induced oxidative stress and chemical composition of biomass burning aerosols
    Li, Jianjun
    Li, Jin
    Wang, Gehui
    Ho, Kin Fai
    Dai, Wenting
    Zhang, Ting
    Wang, Qiyuan
    Wu, Can
    Li, Lijuan
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Qi
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2021, 401
  • [3] Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEAVS experiment and a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements
    Andrews, E
    Saxena, P
    Musarra, S
    Hildemann, LM
    Koutrakis, P
    McMurry, PH
    Olmez, I
    White, WH
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2000, 50 (05): : 648 - 664
  • [4] AS&T virtual collection: Toxicity of ambient particulate matter - impact of chemical composition, emission sources and atmospheric processes
    Verma, Vishal
    Salana, Sudheer
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (05) : 403 - 404
  • [5] Impact of cell types and culture methods on the functionality of in vitro liver systems - A review of cell systems for hepatotoxicity assessment
    Kyffin, Jonathan A.
    Sharma, Parveen
    Leedale, Joseph
    Colley, Helen E.
    Murdoch, Craig
    Mistry, Pratibha
    Webb, Steven D.
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 48 : 262 - 275
  • [6] Donor human milk processing and its impact on infant digestion: A systematic scoping review of in vitro and in vivo studies
    Pitino, Michael A.
    Beggs, Megan R.
    O'Connor, Deborah L.
    Doyen, Alain
    Pouliot, Yves
    Sergius-Ronot, Melanie
    Unger, Sharon
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2023, 14 (01) : 173 - 189
  • [7] Citrus x Clementina Hort. Juice Enriched with Its By-Products (Peels and Leaves): Chemical Composition, In Vitro Bioactivity, and Impact of Processing
    Leporini, Mariarosaria
    Loizzo, Monica Rosa
    Sicari, Vincenzo
    Pellicano, Teresa Maria
    Reitano, Antonella
    Dugay, Annabelle
    Deguin, Brigitte
    Tundis, Rosa
    ANTIOXIDANTS, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [8] Carbonyl Profiles of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Aerosols Reflect Both the Chemical Composition and the Numbers of E-Liquid Ingredients-Focus on the In Vitro Toxicity of Strawberry and Vanilla Flavors
    Noel, Alexandra
    Ghosh, Arpita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [9] Evaluating the In Vitro Activity and Safety of Modified LfcinB Peptides as Potential Colon Anticancer Agents: Cell Line Studies and Insect-Based Toxicity Assessments
    Cardenas-Martinez, Karen J.
    Barragan-Cardenas, Andrea C.
    de la Rosa-Arbelaez, Manuela
    Parra-Giraldo, Claudia M.
    Ochoa-Zarzosa, Alejandra
    Lopez-Meza, Joel E.
    Rivera-Monroy, Zuly J.
    Fierro-Medina, Ricardo
    Garcia-Castaneda, Javier E.
    ACS OMEGA, 2023, 8 (41): : 37948 - 37957