Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma

Introduction: Airway management is a key intervention during the resuscitation of critically ill trauma patients. Emergency surgical airway (ESA) placement is taught as a backup option when endotracheal intubation (ETI) fails. We sought to (1) describe the incidence of the emergency department (ED) ESA, (2) compare ESA versus ETI-only recipients, and (3) determine which factors were associated with receipt of an ESA. Methods: We searched within the Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2017 to 2022 for all emergency department surgical airway placement and/or endotracheal intubations recipients. We compared ESA versus ETI-only recipients. Results: From 2017 to 2022, there were 6,477,759 within the datasets, of which 238,128 met inclusion for this analysis. Within that, there were 236,292 ETIs, 2264 ESAs, with 428 (<1 %) having documentation of both. Of the ESAs performed, there were 82 documented in children <15 years of age with the youngest being 1 year of age. The ETI-only group had a lower proportion serious injuries to the head/neck (52 % versus 59%), face (2 % versus 8 %), and skin (3% versus 6%). However, the ETI-only group had a higher proportion of serious injuries to the abdomen (15 % versus 9%) and the extremities (19% versus 12 %). Survival at 24-h was higher in the ETI-only group (83% versus 76%) as well as survival to discharge (70% versus 67%). In the subanaysis of children <15 years (n = 82), 34% occurred in the 1-4 years age group, 35% in the 5-9 years age group, and 30% in the 10-14 years age group. In our multivariable logistic regression analysis, serious injuries to the head/neck (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95 % CI 1.23-1.54), face (OR 3.41, 2.83-4.11), thorax (OR 1.19, 1.06-1.33), and skin (OR 1.53, 1.15-2.05) were all associated with receipt of cricothyrotomy. Firearm (OR 3.62, 3.18-4.12), stabbing (2.85, 2.09-3.89), and other (OR 2.85, 2.09-3.89) were associated with receipt of ESA when using collision as the reference variable. Conclusions: ESA placement is a rarely performed procedure but frequently used as a primary airway intervention in this dataset. Penetrating mechanisms, and injuries to face were most associated with ESA placement. Our findings reinforce the need to maintain this critical airway skill for trauma management.