Predicting academic productivity among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons fellowship faculty from publications acquired before and during surgical training

Background: Orthopedic residency and fellowship applicants with a strong research record are highly valued for their potential in continuing academic excellence. Despite this, the association between research productivity during training and future academic productivity as an attending orthopedic surgeon is not well-established. We assess the effects of research output during different periods of surgical training as well as residency location on long-term academic productivity as an attending shoulder and elbow surgeon. Methods: A search of the 2022-2023 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Fellowship Directory was conducted to identify a list of orthopedic shoulder and elbow fellowship faculty members. Each surgeon's residency, fellowship and current institution of practice were determined and stratified by geographic location. Total publication counts acquired before residency, during residency, during fellowship, and after fellowship were collected for each faculty member. Attending publication rates and H-indices were calculated. A multivariate linear regression model was created, and significance was set at a P value <.05. Results: A total of 149 shoulder and elbow fellowship faculty members representing 34 fellowship programs were identified. The average number of total publications per surgeon was 88.8 +/- 102. The average attending publication rate was 5.29 +/- 6.89 publications per year. The average H-index for included surgeons was 27.8 +/- 24.4. The number of publications acquired before residency ((3 - 0.293; P < .001), during residency ((3 - 0.110; P - .025) and during fellowship ((3 - 0.593; P <.001) were significantly associated with an increased attending publication rate, but no association was observed with the H-index [before residency ((3 - 0.221; P - .574), during residency ((3 - 0.045; P - .866), during fellowship ((3 - 0.198; P - .678)]. There were no significant differences in total publication count (P - .397), attending publication rate (P - .237), or H-index (P - .364) based on location of residency training. Discussion: Research output before and during surgical training is predictive of continued academic productivity as a shoulder and elbow surgeon. In particular, greater productivity during surgical fellowship was most predictive of academic output as an attending. While long-term academic productivity does not seem to be influenced by the geographic location of residency training, attending surgeons practicing in the Midwest had significantly greater total publication counts and H-indices but similar annual publication rates. Level of Evidence: Survey Study; Cross Sectional Design; Literature and Internet Sources (c) 2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.