Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Postoperative Quality of Life in Ethiopian Women

Introduction and HypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) has a profound influence on a woman's quality of life (QoL). Assessment of QoL using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery is common practice in developed countries, but despite the burden of POP in developing countries, such as Ethiopia, the use of PROs to record preoperative and postoperative QoL scores is limited. This study is aimed at assessing the QoL among Ethiopian women with POP before and after surgery using the validated Pelvic Organ Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Additionally, we will compare postoperative QoL measurements of reconstructive procedures with those of obliterative procedures.MethodsThis is a prospective observational study conducted at a single hospital in Ethiopia on women who were scheduled for surgery for symptomatic POP. Patients' QoL was assessed preoperatively using the P-QoL questionnaire and at each subsequent follow-up visit for 1 year (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Patients undergoing an obliterative procedure were evaluated and compared with those having reconstructive procedures.ResultsThe mean score for general health perceptions, prolapse impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, and emotions was 0 at 12 months postoperatively. Despite significant improvements from baseline, personal relationships, sleep or energy disturbance, and symptom severity measures continued to negatively impact QoL at 12 months postoperatively.ConclusionsQuality of life among Ethiopian women with POP is poor across all domains. Native tissue repair employing either reconstructive or obliterative methods significantly improves QoL across all domains up to 12 months postoperatively. The use of validated tools to assess PROs is essential to provide evidence-based care that improves QoL in ways that are meaningful to patients.