Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Hee [1 ]
Hwang, Jinwook [2 ]
Park, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Gu, Byung Mo [1 ]
Jung, Younggi [3 ]
Yi, Eunjue [3 ]
Lee, Sungho [3 ]
Hwang, Soon Young [4 ]
Chung, Jae ho [3 ]
Kim, Hyun Koo [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Ansan Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Ansan 15355, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
robotics; robotic-assisted thoracic surgery; single-port; subxiphoid; thymectomy; video-assisted thoracic surgery; MINIMALLY INVASIVE THYMECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC THYMECTOMY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16162856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy using the single-port robotic system is currently being developed for minimally invasive surgery. This retrospective multi-institutional study is the largest study of its kind on this technique and is the first to compare the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy. This novel technique was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery, shorter chest tube drainage duration, and shorter postoperative hospital stays, demonstrating its potential as a surgical treatment option for selected patients.Abstract Subxiphoid thymectomy is a novel alternative to the transthoracic approach and sternotomy, with potential benefits, such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. We previously reported the initial experience with subxiphoid single-port robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (SRATS) thymectomy using the single-port robotic system (SPS). However, the efficacy of this technique remains unknown. Thus, this study examined the multi-institutional experience with SRATS thymectomy and compared the perioperative outcomes of this technique to those of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) thymectomy. The data of patients who underwent subxiphoid SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, performed by three thoracic surgeons at three institutions between September 2018 and May 2024, were retrospectively collected. In total, 110 patients were included, with 85 and 25 undergoing SRATS and SVATS thymectomy, respectively. After propensity score matching, 25 patients were included in each group. The SRATS group was associated with a lower conversion rate to multi-port surgery (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.05), shorter chest tube drainage duration (1.32 +/- 0.75 vs. 2.00 +/- 1.29 days, p = 0.003), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.52 +/- 1.00 vs. 5.08 +/- 5.20 days, p = 0.003). Subxiphoid SRATS thymectomy using the SPS is feasible and is a good alternative to conventional thymectomy. Further studies are necessary to confirm its benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Yu, Jiwoong
    Bae, Hoyoung
    Shin, Dongho
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (12) : 1353 - 1358
  • [2] Single-port robotic subcostal major pulmonary resection using the single-port robotic system
    Lee, Jun Hee
    Hong, Jeong In
    Kim, Hyun Koo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (03) : 713 - 722
  • [3] Single-port Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Propensity-Score Matched Study
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Patel, Vipul
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 140 - 145
  • [4] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-port versus multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Park, Jun Seok
    Park, Soo Yeun
    Song, Seung Ho
    Lee, Sung Min
    Jeong, Min Hye
    SURGERY, 2024, 175 (02) : 297 - 303
  • [5] Robotic subxiphoid thymectomy versus lateral thymectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison
    Park, Ji Hyeon
    Na, Kwon Joong
    Kang, Chang Hyun
    Park, Samina
    Park, In Kyu
    Kim, Young Tae
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 62 (01)
  • [6] Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic
    Gungor M.
    Kahraman K.
    Dursun P.
    Ozbasli E.
    Genim C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (1) : 87 - 92
  • [7] Single-incision laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement: A retrospective study of single-port and robotic single-port versus multiport laparoscopy
    Zhang, Yiming
    Gandhi, Manisha
    Birchall, Courtney
    Guan, Xiaoming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 142 (02) : 236 - 238
  • [8] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT STUDY
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Morgantini, Luca
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E985
  • [9] Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy
    Chin, Chih Peng
    Levy, Micah
    Awan, Modassar
    Palese, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 : S66 - S71
  • [10] Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis and a learning curve of single-port approach
    Park, Pyoungjae
    Han, Hyung Joon
    Song, Tae-Jin
    Choi, Sae Byeol
    Kim, Wan-Bae
    Yoo, Young Dong
    Kim, Dong-Sik
    Cha, Jae Hyung
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (09) : 401 - 409