Dosimetric Comparison of CPAP and DIBH for Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Choi, Min Seo [1 ,2 ]
Park, Ryeong Hwang [1 ]
Lee, Joongyo [3 ,4 ]
Cho, Yeona [3 ]
Chang, Jee Suk [1 ]
Kim, Jihun [3 ]
Kim, Jin Sung [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Heavy Ion Therapy Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol,Yonsei Canc Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Med Phys & Biomed Engn Lab MPBEL, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Gachon Univ, Coll Med, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Incheon, South Korea
[5] Oncosoft Inc, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; TERM CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; RADIOTHERAPY; LUNG; HOLD; HEART;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2024.101478
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Despite the increasing interest in using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in radiation therapy (RT), direct comparisons with the more widely used deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) have been limited. This planning study aimed to offer comprehensive geometric and dosimetric evidence by comparing CPAP and DIBH-based RT plans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective data set of 35 patients with left-sided breast cancer with planning computed tomography scans under three breathing conditions (freee breathing (FB), CPAP with 10 cmH2O 2 O pressure, and DIBH) was collected. Volumetric arc therapy plans aimed for 95% dose coverage to 95% of the planning target volume with a maximum dose below 107%. A comparative dosimetric analysis among the three plans was conducted. Additionally, geometric differences were assessed by calculating the minimum distance between the heart and the clinical target volume (CTV) in each planning computed tomography. Results: CPAP and DIBH plans demonstrated comparable mean heart doses (1.05 Gy), which were significantly fi cantly lower than the FB plan (1.34 Gy). The maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery was smallest in the CPAP plan (4.44 Gy), followed by DIBH (4.73 Gy) and FB (7.33 Gy) plans. Other organ-at-risk doses for CPAP and DIBH were similar, with mean contralateral breast doses of 2.27 and 2.21 Gy, mean ipsilateral lung doses of 4.09 and 4.08 Gy, V20 at 6.11% and 6.31%, and mean contralateral lung doses of 0.94 and 0.92 Gy, respectively. No significant fi cant difference was found in the minimum heart-to-CTV distance between CPAP and DIBH. DIBH exhibited the greatest lung volume (3908 cc), followed by CPAP (3509 cc), and FB(2703 cc). Conclusions: The comparison between CPAP and DIBH shows their similarity in both geometric and dosimetric aspects, providing strong evidence for CPAP's ' s effectiveness and feasibility in RT. This suggests its potential as an alternative to DIBH for patients with left-sided breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Irradiation with CPAP for left-sided Breast-Cancer as Alternative to DIBH
    Faerber, M.
    Leblang, M.
    Kurth, M.
    Muller, E.
    Schaefer, H.
    Hoecht, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (SUPPL 1) : S117 - S117
  • [2] Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Radiation Therapy Techniques in Left-Sided Breast Cancer
    Haydaroglu, A.
    Hazeral, Y. Z.
    Hazeral, B.
    Duran, O.
    Karagoz, G.
    Olacak, N.
    Alanyali, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E664 - E664
  • [3] Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
    Rather, Sajad Ahmad
    Banday, Muddasir Sharief
    Khan, Aijaz Ahmad
    Wani, Shaqul Qamar
    Shah, Mudasir Ashraf
    Mufti, Samina
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 25 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [4] Dosimetric benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for women with left-sided breast cancer
    Wells, D. M.
    Wai, E. S.
    Bendorffe, B.
    Beckham, W.
    Popescu, C.
    McDonald, R. E.
    Salter, L.
    Peterson, R.
    Olivotto, I. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S513 - S513
  • [5] DOSIMETRIC BENEFIT OF DEEP INSPIRATION BREATH HOLD (DIBH) AND INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY (IMRT) FOR WOMEN WITH LEFT-SIDED BREAST CANCER
    Wai, E. S.
    Wells, D.
    Bendorffe, B.
    Olivotto, I. A.
    Popescu, C.
    McDonald, R.
    Peterson, R.
    Beckham, W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S14 - S14
  • [6] Dosimetric benefits of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer
    Leticia Del Campo, Maria
    Luna, Javier
    Rincon, Magnolia
    Perez, Marta
    Navarro, Ignacio
    Salgado, Patricia
    Vara, Joser
    Camacho, Carlos
    Guzman, Laura
    Sanchez, Paloma
    Martin, Shaila
    Azinovic, Ignacio
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S562 - S564
  • [7] The Dosimetric Consequence of a Failed Breath Hold for Left-Sided DIBH Breast Treatment
    Sintay, B.
    Wentworth, S.
    Vanderstraeten, C.
    Maurer, J.
    Liu, H.
    Hayes, L.
    Wiant, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3304 - 3304
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
    Ko, Heejoo
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Moon, Jin Young
    Lee, Won Hee
    Shah, Chirag
    Shim, Jin Sup
    Han, Min Cheol
    Baek, Jong Geol
    Park, Ryeong Hwang
    Kim, Yong Bae
    Kim, Jin Sung
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [9] Advantages of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Left-Sided Breast Radiation Therapy
    Reckhow, J.
    Ben-David, M. A.
    Ostrovski, A.
    Illinsky, D.
    Goldstein, J. D.
    Symon, Z.
    Galper, S. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : S184 - S184
  • [10] Motion Stability and Dosimetric Impact of Spirometer-Based DIBH-RT of Left-Sided Breast Cancer
    McKenzie, E.
    Yang, W.
    Burnison, M.
    Mirhadi, A.
    Hakimian, B.
    Stephen, S.
    Robert, R.
    Yue, Y.
    Sandler, H.
    Fraass, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 474 - 474