Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL-2): protocol for a randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Davey, Matthew G. [1 ,2 ]
Donlon, Noel E. [1 ,2 ]
Walsh, Stewart R. [1 ,2 ]
Donohoe, Claire L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Surg Affairs, 121 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Natl Surg Res Support Ctr NSRSC, Dublin, Ireland
来源
BJS OPEN | 2024年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PREVENTION; SURGERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; COST;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrae081
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A proportion of patients undergoing midline laparotomy will develop surgical site infections after surgery. These complications place considerable financial burden on healthcare economies and have negative implications for patient health and quality of life. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy devices has been mooted as a pragmatic strategy to reduce surgical site infections. Nevertheless, further availability of multicentre randomized clinical trial data evaluating the prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy following midline laparotomy is warranted to definitely provide consensus in relation to these closure methods, while also deciphering potential differences among subgroups. The aim of this study is to determine whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing midline laparotomy.Methods PROPEL-2 is a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial designed to compare standard surgical dressings (control arm) with negative pressure wound therapy dressings (Prevena (TM) and PICO (TM) being the most commonly utilized). Patient recruitment will include adult patients aged 18 years or over, who are indicated to undergo emergency or elective laparotomy. To achieve 90% power at the 5% significance level, 1006 patients will be required in each arm, which when allowing for losses to follow-up, 10% will be added to each arm, leaving the total projected sample size to be 2013 patients, who will be recruited across a 36-month enrolment period.Conclusion The PROPEL-2 trial will be the largest independent multicentre randomized clinical trial designed to assess the role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients indicated to undergo midline laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available negative pressure wound therapy devices will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. Enrolment to PROPEL-2 began in June 2023. Registration number: NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).Conclusion The PROPEL-2 trial will be the largest independent multicentre randomized clinical trial designed to assess the role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients indicated to undergo midline laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available negative pressure wound therapy devices will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. Enrolment to PROPEL-2 began in June 2023. Registration number: NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The PROPEL-2 prospective, randomized study looking to evaluate the role of negative pressure wound therapy for laparotomy wounds.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial
    Noel Edward Donlon
    P. A. Boland
    M. E. Kelly
    K. Schmidt
    F. Cooke
    P. M. Neary
    K. M. Barry
    J. V. Reynolds
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2019, 34 : 2003 - 2010
  • [2] Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial
    Donlon, Noel Edward
    Boland, P. A.
    Kelly, M. E.
    Schmidt, K.
    Cooke, F.
    Neary, P. M.
    Barry, K. M.
    Reynolds, J. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (11) : 2003 - 2010
  • [3] Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Zhou, Qin C.
    Schiavone, Maria B.
    Cowan, Renee A.
    Smith, Evan S.
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Veith, Mitchell
    Rafizadeh, Michael
    Curran, Katherine
    Ramesh, Bhavani
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Brown, Amy K.
    Cosin, Jonathan A.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Martino, Martin A.
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    Roche, Kara Long
    Jewell, Elizabeth L.
    Broach, Vance
    Lambrou, Nicholas C.
    Diaz, John P.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 334 - 341
  • [4] Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for spinal wounds: a systematic review
    Ousey, Karen J.
    Atkinson, Ross A.
    Williamson, J. Bradley
    Lui, Steve
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (10): : 1393 - 1405
  • [5] CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF A NEW NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) SYSTEM IN HARD TO HEAL WOUNDS
    Brett, Dave
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2013, 40 : S9 - S10
  • [7] Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) & conventional wound dressings in the open fracture wounds
    Arti, Hamidreza
    Khorami, Mohsen
    Ebrahimi-Nejad, Vahid
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [8] A randomised controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy at primary closure of midline laparotomy wounds
    Carter, M. R.
    Burton, M.
    Anglim, B.
    Concannon, E.
    Pierce, C.
    Coffey, S. N.
    Wijewardene, D.
    Burton, E.
    Waldron, D.
    Hickey, K.
    Coffey, J. C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S111 - S111
  • [9] Should infected laparotomy wounds be treated with negative pressure wound therapy?
    Tan, A.
    Gollop, N. D.
    Klimach, G.
    Maruthappu, M.
    Smith, S. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (01) : 26 - 29
  • [10] Comment on "Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions''
    Timmer, Allard S.
    Zwanenburg, Pieter R.
    Boermeester, Marja A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E716 - E717