Why do female lead auditors charge a fee premium? evidence from the UK audit market

被引:0
|
作者
Owusu, Andrews [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Noel [2 ,3 ]
Kwabi, Frank [3 ]
Holmes, Mark David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Derby, Coll Business Law & Social Sci, Derby Business Sch, Derby DE22 1GB, England
[2] Loughborough Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough LE11 3TU, England
[3] De Montfort Univ, Leicester Castle Business Sch, Leicester LE1 9BH, England
[4] Birmingham City Univ, Business Law & Social Sci, Birmingham B4 7BD, England
关键词
Auditor gender; Audit timeliness; Audit fees; REPORT LAG; NONAUDIT SERVICES; DIVIDEND ANNOUNCEMENTS; GENDER; EARNINGS; DETERMINANTS; QUALITY; SPECIALIZATION; TENURE; REAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100650
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Existing research documents a fee premium for audits led by female partners (Ittonen and Peni, 2012, Hardies et al., 2015, Burke et al., 2019, Lee et al., 2019, Hardies et al., 2021). We take this work forward by investigating a possible justification for the observed premium by examining how auditor gender is related to audit report lag and whether the female partner audit fee premium is driven by audit report lag. We find that United Kingdom companies audited by a female lead auditor have a significantly shorter audit report lag but pay a significantly higher audit fee. In further analysis, we find that the fee premium for female partner-led audits is higher for clients receiving a more timely audit opinion. Our findings are consistent with female lead auditors delivering more timely audits and with audit clients being prepared to pay a premium for such timeliness. Our study extends our understanding of the importance of gender in the auditing process and the value clients see in audits led by female auditors. Given the relatively low proportion of female lead auditors, our findings should also encourage audit firms to appreciate the economic value of female lead auditors and to actively facilitate their progression to senior roles.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Big 4 fee premium and audit quality: latest evidence from UK listed companies
    Campa, Domenico
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (08) : 680 - +
  • [2] Reverse merger audit fee premium: Evidence from China
    Cheng, Zijian
    Liu, Zhangxin
    Wang, Isabel Zhe
    Zhao, Xingju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 94
  • [3] Do auditors charge a client business risk premium? Evidence from audit fees and derivative hedging in the US oil and gas industry
    Ranasinghe, Tharindra
    Yi, Lin
    Zhou, Ling
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2023, 28 (02) : 1107 - 1139
  • [4] School ties between external auditors and audit committee: evidence from the audit fee in Indonesia
    Harymawan, Iman
    Sani, Nurhaliza
    Minanurohman, Adib
    Shafie, Rohami
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2024,
  • [5] Do auditors charge a client business risk premium? Evidence from audit fees and derivative hedging in the U.S. oil and gas industry
    Tharindra Ranasinghe
    Lin Yi
    Ling Zhou
    [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2023, 28 : 1107 - 1139
  • [6] Audit pricing and the Big4 fee premium: evidence from Belgium
    Van Caneghem, Tom
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2010, 25 (02) : 122 - +
  • [7] Market Competition, Audit Fee Stickiness, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Chang, Hsihui
    Guo, Yingwen
    Mo, Phyllis Lai Lan
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2019, 38 (02): : 79 - 99
  • [8] Auditors' workload and audit quality under audit hour budget pressure: Evidence from the Korean audit market
    Hwang, Seokyoun
    Hong, Philip Keejae
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2022, 26 (03) : 371 - 387
  • [9] Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China
    Athavale, Manoj
    Guo, Zhaorui
    Meng, Yun
    Zhang, Tianshu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 78 : 554 - 571
  • [10] Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data
    Gul, Ferdinand A.
    Wu, Donghui
    Yang, Zhifeng
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (06): : 1993 - 2023