Algorithm for Multifocus Image Fusion Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition and Discrete Cosine Transform

被引:0
|
作者
Shi Yanqiong [1 ]
Wang Changwen [1 ]
Lu Rongsheng [2 ]
Zha Zhao [1 ]
Zhu Guang [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Instrument Sci & Optoelect Engn, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
image processing; image fusion; low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition; discrete cosine transform;
D O I
10.3788/LOP231855
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
To resolve the problems of scattered focus-edge blurring, artifacts, and block effects during the multifocus image fusion, an algorithm based on low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition (LRSMD) and discrete cosine transform (DCT) is designed to achieve the multifocus image fusion. First, the source images were decomposed into low-rank and sparse matrices using LRSMD. Subsequently, the DCT-based method was designed for detecting the focus regions in the low-rank matrix part and obtaining the initial focus decision map. The decision map was verified using the repeated consistency verification method. Meanwhile, the fusion strategy based on morphological filtering was designed to obtain fusion results of the sparse matrix. Finally, the two parts were fused using the weighted reconstruction method. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has the advantages of high clarity and full focus in subjective evaluations. The best results for the four metrics, including edge information retention, peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity, and correlation coefficient in objective evaluations, improved by 62.3%, 6.3%, 2.2%, and 6.3%, respectively, compared with the other five mainstream algorithms. These improvement results prove that the proposed algorithm effectively improves focused information extraction from source images and enhances the focused edge detail information. Furthermore, the algorithm is crucial for reducing the artifact and block effects.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Abdollahzadeh M, 2016, IRAN CONF ELECTR ENG, P1673, DOI 10.1109/IranianCEE.2016.7585790
  • [2] Fast discrete curvelet transforms
    Candes, Emmanuel
    Demanet, Laurent
    Donoho, David
    Ying, Lexing
    [J]. MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2006, 5 (03): : 861 - 899
  • [3] Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Spatial Frequency in Discrete Cosine Transform Domain
    Cao, Liu
    Jin, Longxu
    Tao, Hongjiang
    Li, Guoning
    Zhuang, Zhuang
    Zhang, Yanfu
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2015, 22 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [4] Multi-focus image fusion based on non-subsampled shearlet transform
    Gao Guorong
    Xu Luping
    Feng Dongzhu
    [J]. IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2013, 7 (06) : 633 - 639
  • [5] Multi-focus image fusion for visual sensor networks in DCT domain
    Haghighat, Mohammad Bagher Akbari
    Aghagolzadeh, Ali
    Seyedarabi, Nadi
    [J]. COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 37 (05) : 789 - 797
  • [6] Multi-Focus Image Fusion Method for Microscopic Algal Images
    Jia Renqing
    Yin Gaofang
    Zhao Nanjing
    Xu Min
    Hu Xiang
    Huang Peng
    Liang Tianhong
    Zhu Yu
    Chen Xiaowei
    Gan Tingting
    Zhang Xiaoling
    [J]. ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2023, 43 (12)
  • [7] Li H, 2022, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1804.08992, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1804.08992]
  • [8] Sparse Representation-Based Multi-Focus Image Fusion Method via Local Energy in Shearlet Domain
    Li, Liangliang
    Lv, Ming
    Jia, Zhenhong
    Ma, Hongbing
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (06)
  • [9] Laplacian Redecomposition for Multimodal Medical Image Fusion
    Li, Xiaoxiao
    Guo, Xiaopeng
    Han, Pengfei
    Wang, Xiang
    Li, Huaguang
    Luo, Tao
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2020, 69 (09) : 6880 - 6890
  • [10] Infrared and visible image fusion with convolutional neural networks
    Liu, Yu
    Chen, Xun
    Cheng, Juan
    Peng, Hu
    Wang, Zengfu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WAVELETS MULTIRESOLUTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2018, 16 (03)