Systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and tools to promote shared decision making in the emergency department

被引:0
|
作者
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Matthijssen, Melissa [2 ]
Lemrini, Samia [2 ]
van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S. [3 ]
Bloemers, Frank W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Locat AMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Res Support Med Lib, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Trauma Surg, Locat AMC, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
barriers; emergency department; facilitators; patient decision aids; shared decision making; MIXED-METHODS; CHOICE; CARE; AID; INTERVENTION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14998
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe objective was to systematically review all studies focusing on barriers, facilitators, and tools currently available for shared decision making (SDM) in emergency departments (EDs).BackgroundImplementing SDM in EDs seems particularly challenging, considering the fast-paced environment and sometimes life-threatening situations. Over 10 years ago, a previous review revealed only a few patient decision aids (PtDAs) available for EDs.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library, up to November 2023. Observational and interventional studies were included to address barriers or facilitators for SDM or to investigate effects of PtDAs on the level of SDM for patients visiting an ED.ResultsWe screened 1946 studies for eligibility, of which 33 were included. PtDAs studied in EDs address chest pain, syncope, analgesics usage, lumbar puncture, ureterolithiasis, vascular access, concussion/brain bleeding, head-CT choice, coaching for elderly people, and activation of patients with appendicitis. Only the primary outcome was meta-analyzed, showing that PtDAs significantly increased the level of SDM (18.8 on the 100-point OPTION scale; 95% CI 12.5-25.0). PtDAs also tended to increase patient knowledge, decrease decisional conflict and decrease health care services usage, with no obvious effect on overall patient satisfaction. Barriers and facilitators were identified on three levels: (1) patient level-emotions, health literacy, and their own proactivity; (2) clinician level-fear of medicolegal consequences, lack of SDM skills or knowledge, and their ideas about treatment superiority; and (3) system level-time constraints, institutional guidelines, and availability of PtDAs.ConclusionsCircumstances in EDs are generally less favorable for SDM. However, PtDAs for conditions seen in EDs are helpful in overcoming barriers to SDM and are welcomed by patients. Even in EDs, SDM is feasible and supported by an increasing number of tools for patients and physicians.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Boland, Laura
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legare, France
    Lewis, Krystina
    Jull, Janet
    Shephard, Allyson
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Davis, Alexandra
    Yameogo, Audrey
    Stacey, Dawn
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [2] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Laura Boland
    Ian D. Graham
    France Légaré
    Krystina Lewis
    Janet Jull
    Allyson Shephard
    Margaret L. Lawson
    Alexandra Davis
    Audrey Yameogo
    Dawn Stacey
    [J]. Implementation Science, 14
  • [3] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Covvey, Jordan R.
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    Gorse, Erin E.
    Mehta, Zumi
    Dhumal, Trupti
    Heidari, Elham
    Rao, Deepika
    Zacker, Christopher
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (05) : 1613 - 1637
  • [4] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature
    Jordan R. Covvey
    Khalid M. Kamal
    Erin E. Gorse
    Zumi Mehta
    Trupti Dhumal
    Elham Heidari
    Deepika Rao
    Christopher Zacker
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1613 - 1637
  • [5] Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness A Systematic Review
    Austin, C. Adrian
    Mohottige, Dinushika
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Smith, Alexander K.
    Hanson, Laura C.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (07) : 1213 - 1221
  • [6] Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the Emergency Department: an exploratory analysis
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth M.
    Goff, Sarah L.
    Elia, Tala R.
    Khordipour, Errel R.
    Poronsky, Kye E.
    Nault, Kelly A.
    Lindenauer, Peter K.
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (06) : 346 - 354
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review
    Alex Waddell
    Alyse Lennox
    Gerri Spassova
    Peter Bragge
    [J]. Implementation Science, 16
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review
    Pel-Littel, Ruth E.
    Snaterse, Marjolein
    Teppich, Nelly Marela
    Buurman, Bianca M.
    van Etten-Jamaludin, Faridi S.
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    Minkman, Mirella M.
    Scholte Op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [9] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review
    Waddell, Alex
    Lennox, Alyse
    Spassova, Gerri
    Bragge, Peter
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [10] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO PARTICIPATION IN SHARED DECISION MAKING IN CANCER CARE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
    Kamal, K. M.
    Covvey, J. R.
    Mehta, Z.
    Zacker, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S48 - S49