A comprehensive evaluation of Cell Elution Method (CEM) for forensic DNA analysis from smoked cigarettes

被引:0
|
作者
Ekka, Molina Madhulika [1 ]
Shadil, Aflah [1 ]
Patel, Bhargav C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Forens Sci Univ NFSU, Lab Forens Biol & Biotechnol, Gandhinagar 382007, Gujarat, India
[2] Natl Forens Sci Univ, Ctr Excellence DNA Forens, Gandhinagar 382007, India
关键词
Forensic; DNA; Cigarette Butt; STR profiling; Trace DNA; EXTRACTION METHODS; PCR; INHIBITORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112220
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Cigarette stubs are commonly encountered trace DNA samples at crime scenes. Standard laboratory practice typically involves direct lysis of the stub for DNA extraction, leading to the co-extraction of DNA-degrading and inhibiting constituents from smoke and tobacco. This process can result in lower-quality DNA profiles. There has been limited focus on developing specific sample processing techniques that minimize these degrading agents and inhibitors before DNA extraction, which could significantly enhance the quality of DNA profiles. This study evaluates a previously established Cell Elution Method (CEM) against the conventional Direct Lysis Method (DLM) for DNA extraction from cigarette stubs. DNA quantity, quality, and subsequent STR profiles were assessed in 80 smoked cigarette stubs, comprising both flavoured and unflavoured types. While CEM exhibited comparable DNA yield from both flavoured (0.17 ng) and unflavoured (0.19 ng) cigarettes, DLM showed significant variability in average DNA yield for unflavoured (0.05 ng) and for flavoured (0.25 ng) cigarettes. Notably, CEMtreated samples demonstrated lower Degradation Index (DI) values compared to DLM-treated ones for both the types of cigarettes. Consequently, STR profiling success rates were higher with CEM, with 95 % of flavoured and 55 % of unflavoured samples yielding informative profiles, compared to 80 % and 0 %, respectively, for DLM. In unflavoured stubs, Amelogenin marker amplification was achieved in 35 % of CEM-treated samples, significantly outperforming the 5 % success rate with DLM. Additionally, CEM resulted in higher average allele recovery rates for both flavoured (58.98 %) and unflavoured (33.41 %) samples compared to DLM. These findings indicate that CEM outperforms DLM in producing higher-quality DNA profiles from cigarette stubs. Thus, CEM can be a choice of method for processing cigarette stub prior to DNA extraction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A method for comprehensive genomic analysis of cell free DNA
    Parpart-Li, S.
    Angiuoli, S. V.
    Chesnick, B.
    Galens, K.
    Jones, S.
    Kadan, M.
    Kann, L.
    Lytle, K.
    Murphy, D.
    Nesselbush, M.
    Phallen, J.
    Riley, D.
    Shukla, M.
    Zhang, T.
    Husain, H.
    Velculescu, V.
    Diaz, L. A., Jr.
    Sausen, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [2] A method for comprehensive genomic analysis of cell free DNA
    Parpart-Li, Sonya T.
    Angiuoli, Samuel V.
    Chesnick, Bryan
    Galens, Kevin
    Jones, Sian
    Kadan, Maura
    Kann, Lisa
    Lytle, Karli
    Murphy, Derek
    Nesselbush, Monica
    Phallen, Jillian
    Riley, David
    Shukla, Manish
    Zhang, Theresa
    Husain, Hatim
    Velculescu, Victor E.
    Diaz, Luis A.
    Sausen, Mark
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [3] Evaluation of an alkaline lysis method for the extraction of DNA from whole blood and forensic stains for STR analysis
    Klintschar, M
    Neuhuber, F
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2000, 45 (03) : 669 - 673
  • [4] A method for comprehensive genomic analysis of cell-free DNA.
    Parpart-Li, Sonya
    Angiuoli, Samuel V.
    Chesnick, Bryan
    Galens, Kevin
    Jones, Sian
    Kadan, Maura
    Kann, Lisa
    Lytle, Karli
    Murphy, Derek M.
    Nesselbush, Monica
    Phallen, Jillian
    Riley, David
    Shukla, Manish
    Zhang, Theresa
    Husain, Hatim
    Velculescu, Victor E.
    Diaz, Luis A.
    Sausen, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [5] THE EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MATCH CRITERIA FOR FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF DNA
    LABER, TL
    IVERSON, JT
    LIBERTY, JA
    GIESE, SA
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1995, 40 (06) : 1058 - 1064
  • [6] Mouth level smoke exposure using analysis of filters from smoked cigarettes: A study of eight countries
    Mariner, D. C.
    Ashley, M.
    Shepperd, C. J.
    Mullard, G.
    Dixon, M.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 61 (03) : S39 - S50
  • [7] Evaluation of Methods to Improve the Extraction and Recovery of DNA from Cotton Swabs for Forensic Analysis
    Adamowicz, Michael S.
    Stasulli, Dominique M.
    Sobestanovich, Emily M.
    Bille, Todd W.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [8] Evaluation of Methods to Process Bone Evidence for Forensic DNA Analysis
    Li, R.
    Klempner, S.
    Carter, D.
    Saenz, Y.
    IALM 2012: PRESENTATIONS FROM THE 22ND CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2013, : 265 - 268
  • [9] Evaluation of OpenArray™ as a Genotyping Method for Forensic DNA Phenotyping and Human Identification
    Ragazzo, Michele
    Puleri, Giulio
    Errichiello, Valeria
    Manzo, Laura
    Luzzi, Laura
    Potenza, Saverio
    Strafella, Claudia
    Peconi, Cristina
    Nicastro, Fabio
    Caputo, Valerio
    Giardina, Emiliano
    GENES, 2021, 12 (02) : 1 - 10
  • [10] DNA ALKALINE ELUTION METHOD AS A CRITERION FOR EVALUATION OF X-IRRADIATION OR DRUG TREATMENTS
    POTMESIL, M
    GOLDFEDER, A
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1980, 83 (02) : 425 - 426