AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support System Modeling for the Prediction of Cirrhosis Complications

被引:0
|
作者
Hsieh, Vivian Chia-Rong [1 ]
Liu, Meng-Yu [1 ]
Lin, Hsueh-Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
关键词
Extract-transform-load process; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Clinical decision support system; Cirrhosis complications; PORTAL-HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.irbm.2024.100854
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Utilizing artificial intelligence (AI), a clinical decision support system (CDSS), can help physicians anticipate possible complications of cirrhosis patients before prescribing more accurate treatments. This study aimed to establish a prototype of AI-CDSS modeling using electronic health records to predict five complications for cirrhosis patients who were controlled for oral antiviral drugs, lamivudine (LAM) or entecavir (ETV). Methods: Our modeling attained a web-based AI-CDSS with four steps - data extraction, sample normalization, AI-enabled machine learning (ML), and system integration. We designed the extracttransform-load (ETL) procedure to filter the analytics features from a clinical database. The data training process applied 10-fold cross-validation to verify diverse ML models due to possible feature patterns with medications for predicting the complications. In addition, we applied both statistical means and standard deviations of the realistic datasets to create the simulative datasets, which contained sufficient and balanced data to train the most efficient models for evaluation. The modeling combined multiple ML methods, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting, naive Bayes, and logistic regression, for training fourteen features to generate the AI-CDSS's prediction functionality. Results: The models achieving an accuracy of 0.8 after cross-validations would be qualified for the AI-CDSS. SVM and RF models using realistic data predicted jaundice with an accuracy of over 0.82. Furthermore, the SVM models using simulative data reached an accuracy of over 0.85 when predicting patients with jaundice. Our approaches implied that the simulative datasets based on the same distributions as that of the features in the realistic dataset were adequate for training the ML models. The RF model could reach an AUC of up to 0.82 for multiple complications by testing with the untrained data. Finally, we successfully installed twenty models of the suitable ML methods in the AI-CDSS to predict five complications for cirrhosis patients prescribed with LAM or ETV. Conclusions: Our modeling integrated a self-developed AI-CDSS with the approved ML models to predict cirrhosis complications for aiding clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Clinical Simulation to Evaluate AI-Enabled Decision Support
    Lyell, David
    Lustig, Adriaan
    Denyer, Kate
    Vedantam, Satya
    Magrabi, Farah
    [J]. MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 299 - 303
  • [2] An FP's guide to AI-enabled clinical decision support
    Halamka, John
    Cerrato, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 68 (09): : 486 - 492
  • [3] AI-Enabled Decision Support System for Enterprise Modeling: Methodology, Technology Stack, and Architecture
    Shilov, Nikolay
    Othman, Walaa
    [J]. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2024, 934 LNNS : 135 - 146
  • [4] Status of AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems Implementations in China
    Ji, Mengting
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    Genchev, Georgi Z.
    Wei, Mingyue
    Yu, Guangjun
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (05/06) : 123 - 132
  • [5] Toward a responsible future: recommendations for AI-enabled clinical decision support
    Labkoff, Steven
    Oladimeji, Bilikis
    Kannry, Joseph
    Solomonides, Anthony
    Leftwich, Russell
    Koski, Eileen
    Joseph, Amanda L.
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Monica
    Fleisher, Lee A.
    Nolen, Kimberly
    Dutta, Sayon
    Levy, Deborah R.
    Price, Amy
    Barr, Paul J.
    Hron, Jonathan D.
    Lin, Baihan
    Srivastava, Gyana
    Pastor, Nuria
    Luque, Unai Sanchez
    Bui, Tien Thi Thuy
    Singh, Reva
    Williams, Tayler
    Weiner, Mark G.
    Naumann, Tristan
    Sittig, Dean F.
    Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
    Quintana, Yuri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024,
  • [6] INCORPORATING EXPLAINABILITY AND INTERPRETABILITY INTO AI-ENABLED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    Jacobs, P.
    Espinoza, A.
    Dodier, R.
    Young, G.
    Branigan, D.
    Eom, J.
    Chen, D.
    Mosquera-Lopez, C.
    El Youssef, J.
    Pinsonault, J.
    Leitschuh, J.
    Wilson, L.
    Castle, J.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 25 : A3 - A3
  • [7] How Well Do AI-Enabled Decision Support Systems Perform in Clinical Settings?
    Susanto, Anindya Pradipta
    Lyell, David
    Widyantoro, Bambang
    Berkovsky, Shlomo
    Magrabi, Farah
    [J]. MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 279 - 283
  • [8] AI-enabled support system for melanoma detection and Classification
    Saxena, Vivek Sen
    Johri, Prashant
    Kumar, Avneesh
    [J]. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 2021, 14 (04) : 72 - 93
  • [9] AI-enabled support system for melanoma detection and classification
    Saxena, Vivek Sen
    Johri, Prashant
    Kumar, Avneesh
    [J]. International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing, 2021, 13 (04) : 65 - 74
  • [10] Choice, Uncertainty, and Decision Superiority: Is Less AI-Enabled Decision Support More?
    Ward, Paul
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (04) : 781 - 791