Opt-out defaults do not increase organ donation rates

被引:0
|
作者
Dallacker, M. [1 ]
Appelius, L. [1 ]
Brandmaier, A. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Morais, A. S. [1 ]
Hertwig, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Rational, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Lifespan Psychol, Lentzeallee 94, DE-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] MSB Med Sch Berlin, Dept Psychol, Rudesheimer Str 50, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[4] Max Planck UCL Ctr Computat Psychiat & Ageing Res, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Organ donation; Defaults; Explicit consent; Presumed consent; Longitudinal analysis; Health policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2024.08.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To increase organ donation rates, many countries have switched from an opt-in ('explicit consent') default for organ donation to an opt-out ('presumed consent') default. This study sought to determine the extent to which this change in default has led to an increase in the number of deceased individuals who become organ donors. Study design: Longitudinal retrospective analysis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of within-country longitudinal data to assess the effect of changing the organ donation default policy from opt-in to opt-out. Our analysis focused on the longitudinal deceased donor rates in five countries (Argentina, Chile, Sweden, Uruguay, Wales) that had adopted this change. Using a Bayesian aggregated binomial regression model, we estimated the odds of organ donation within each country over time, as well as the effect of the policy switch. Results: Switching from an opt-in to an opt-out default did not result in an increase in donation rates when averaged across countries. Moreover, the opt-out default did not lead to even a gradual increase in donations: there was no discernible difference in the linear rate of change of donations after the change in default. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduction in the odds of donation across all five countries. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis suggests that changing to an opt-out default does not increase organ donation rates. Unless flanked by investments in healthcare, public awareness campaigns, and efforts to address the concerns of the deceased's relatives, a shift to an opt-out default is unlikely to increase organ donations. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 440
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opt-out organ donation in England
    Burki, Talha Khan
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (05): : 443 - 443
  • [2] HEAD TO HEAD Is an opt-out system likely to increase organ donation?
    English, Veronica
    Johnson, Emma
    Sadler, Blair L.
    Sadler, Alfred M., Jr.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 364
  • [3] Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems
    Arshad, Adam
    Anderson, Benjamin
    Sharif, Adnan
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 95 (06) : 1453 - 1460
  • [4] Normative consent and opt-out organ donation
    Saunders, Ben
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2010, 36 (02) : 84 - 87
  • [5] Organ Donation: Is the Opt-out System the Solution?
    Kolbrink, B.
    NEPHROLOGE, 2019, 14 (06): : 473 - 474
  • [6] Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
    Saunders, Ben
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 38 (02) : 69 - 72
  • [7] Opt-out organ donation: on evidence and public policy
    Willis, Brian H.
    Quigley, Muireann
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2014, 107 (02) : 56 - 60
  • [8] Opt-Out to the Rescue: Organ Donation and Samaritan Duties
    Midtgaard, Soren Flinch
    Albertsen, Andreas
    PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS, 2021, 14 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [9] Proposals for opt-out organ donation launched for England
    Iacobucci, Gareth
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359
  • [10] Opt-out scheme is still best way to increase organ donation, says BMA
    Mayor, Susan
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344