Comparing caloric restriction regimens for effective weight management in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Jinming [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Chen, Maohua [2 ]
Cai, Zhaolun [3 ]
Cai, Zhen [2 ]
Jiang, Zhiyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Key Lab Rehabil Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Body weight; Intermittent fasting; Calorie restriction; Alternate day fasting; Time restrict eating; Short-term fasting; CONTINUOUS ENERGY RESTRICTION; DISEASE RISK MARKERS; BODY-WEIGHT; INTERMITTENT ENERGY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; OVERWEIGHT; HEALTH; IMPROVEMENT; OBESITY; STROKE;
D O I
10.1186/s12966-024-01657-9
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundRandomized controlled trials have confirmed the effectiveness of four prevalent caloric restriction regimens in reducing obesity-related health risks. However, there is no consensus on the optimal regimen for weight management in adults.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 15, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving adults, evaluating the weight-loss effects of alternate day fasting (ADF), short-term fasting (STF), time-restricted eating (TRE), and continuous energy restriction (CER). The primary outcome was body weight, with secondary outcomes including BMI, fat mass, lean mass, waist circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, and adverse events. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted, ranking regimens using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and the probability of being the best. Study quality was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.ResultsData from 47 RCTs (representing 3363 participants) were included. ADF showed the most significant body weight loss (Mean difference (MD): -3.42; 95% Confidence interval (CI): -4.28 to -2.55), followed by TRE (MD: -2.25; 95% CI: -2.92 to -1.59). STF (MD: -1.87; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.56) and CER (MD: -1.59; 95% CI: -2.42 to -0.79) rank third and fourth, respectively. STF lead to decline in lean mass (MD: -1.26; 95% CI: -2.16, -0.47). TRE showed benefits on fasting glucose (MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -4.7, -1.26). Subgroup analysis revealed all four caloric restriction regimens likely lead to modest weight loss after 1-3 months, with ADF ranked highest, but by 4-6 months, varying degrees of weight regain occur, particularly with CER, while interventions lasting 7-12 months may result in effective weight loss, with TRE potentially ranking first during both the 4-6 months and 7-12 months periods. ADF showing fewer and shorter-lasting physical symptoms.ConclusionAll four included regiments were effective in reducing body weight, with ADF likely having the most significant impact. Each regimen likely leads to modest weight loss after 1-3 months, followed by weight regain by 4-6 months. However, interventions lasting 7-12 months achieve greater weight loss overall.Trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42022382478.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Exercise Interventions On Reactive Balance In Older Adults: A Systematic Review And Network Meta-analysis
    Kim, Youngwook
    Vakula, Michael N.
    Bolton, David A. E.
    Bressel, Eadric
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 534 - 534
  • [2] Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications in adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mi, Keying
    Wu, Sijia
    Lv, Chanyuan
    Meng, Yongkang
    Yin, Wenchao
    Li, Hongkai
    Li, Jiangbing
    Yuan, Haitao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [3] Comparative efficacy of exercise regimens on sleep quality in older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Hasan, Faizul
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Lin, Chih-Ming
    Chuang, Li-Pang
    Jeng, Chii
    Yuliana, Lia Taurussia
    Chen, Ting-Jhen
    Chiu, Hsiao-Yean
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2022, 65
  • [4] Basal Insulin Regimens for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Dawoud, Dalia
    O'Mahony, Rachel
    Wonderling, David
    Cobb, Jill
    Higgins, Bernard
    Amiel, Stephanie A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (02) : 176 - 184
  • [5] Effects of traditional Chinese medicines on weight management among adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Chen, Meifang
    Liu, Jiaqi
    [J]. OBESITY SCIENCE & PRACTICE, 2024, 10 (03):
  • [6] Short-term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harris, L.
    McGarty, A.
    Hutchison, L.
    Ells, L.
    Hankey, C.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2018, 19 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] How Effective Are Dietitians in Weight Management? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Williams, Lauren T.
    Barnes, Katelyn
    Ball, Lauren
    Ross, Lynda J.
    Sladdin, Ishtar
    Mitchell, Lana J.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [8] Chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gillian K Gresham
    George A Wells
    Sharlene Gill
    Christopher Cameron
    Derek J Jonker
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 14
  • [9] A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for faecal incontinence
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Lal, Nikhil
    Pellino, Gianluca
    Baird, Daniel
    Nikolaou, Stella
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Smith, Jason J.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 66 : 37 - 47
  • [10] A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for anal fissure
    Jin, James Z.
    Bhat, Sameer
    Park, Brittany
    Hardy, Molly-Olivia
    Unasa, Hanson
    Mauiliu-Wallis, Melbourne
    Hill, Andrew G.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2022, 172 (01) : 41 - 52