The April 2023 SYM-H =-233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event

被引:0
|
作者
Hajra, Rajkumar [1 ]
Tsurutani, Bruce Tsatnam
Lu, Quanming [1 ,2 ]
Horne, Richard B. [3 ]
Lakhina, Gurbax Singh
Yang, Xu [4 ]
Henri, Pierre [5 ,6 ]
Du, Aimin [7 ,8 ]
Gao, Xingliang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Rongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Lu, San [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, CAS Key Lab Geospace Environm, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] CAS Ctr Excellence Comparat Planetol, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, England
[4] Natl Univ Def Technol, Inst Meteorol & Oceanog, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Orleans, CNRS, Lab Phys & Chim Environm & Espace LPC2E, Orleans, France
[6] Univ Cote Azur, Lab Lagrange, Obervatoire Cote Azur, CNRS, Nice, France
[7] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, CAS Engn Lab Deep Resources Equipment & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Earth & Planetary Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
geomagnetic storm; substorm; supersubstorm; sub-Alfv & eacute; nic solar wind; magnetic reconnection; radiation belts; INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC-FIELD; OUTER RADIATION BELT; ALFVENIC SOLAR-WIND; ELECTRON ACCELERATION; ALIGNED CURRENTS; INTER-PLANETARY; CYCLOTRON WAVES; ENERGY; SYSTEM; SHOCKS;
D O I
10.1029/2024JA032986
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The 23-24 April 2023 double-peak (SYM-H intensities of -179 and -233 nT) intense geomagnetic storm was caused by interplanetary magnetic field southward component Bs associated with an interplanetary fast-forward shock-preceded sheath (Bs of 25 nT), followed by a magnetic cloud (MC) (Bs of 33 nT), respectively. These interplanetary structures were led by a coronal mass ejection erupted from the Sun in association with an M1.7 X-ray flare. At the center of the MC, the plasma density exhibited an order of magnitude decrease, leading to a sub-Alfv & eacute;nic solar wind interval for similar to 2.1 hr. Ionospheric Joule heating accounted for a significant part (similar to 81%) of the magnetospheric energy dissipation during the storm main phase. Equal amount of Joule heating in the dayside and nightside ionosphere is consistent with the observed intense and global-scale DP2 (disturbance polar) currents during the storm main phase. The sub-Alfv & eacute;nic solar wind is associated with disappearance of substorms, a sharp decrease in Joule heating dissipation, and reduction in electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave amplitude. The shock/sheath compression of the magnetosphere led to relativistic electron flux losses in the outer radiation belt between L* = 3.5 and 5.5. Relativistic electron flux enhancements were detected in the lower L* <= 3.5 region during the storm main and recovery phases. Equatorial ionospheric plasma anomaly structures are found to be modulated by the prompt penetration electric fields. Around the anomaly crests, plasma density at similar to 470 km altitude and altitude-integrated ionospheric total electron content are found to increase by similar to 60% and similar to 80%, with similar to 33% and similar to 67% increases in their latitudinal extents compared to their quiet-time values, respectively. A fast interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) and its upstream sheath caused severe disturbances in the Earth's magnetosphere during 23-24 April 2023. The sheath anti-sunward of the fast ICME shock was composed of high-density plasmas and intense magnetic fields. This was followed by a plasma density rarefaction and intense magnetic fields with a field rotation (known as a magnetic cloud). This complex interplanetary structure resulted in a double-peak geomagnetic storm, and several intense auroral substorms. Solar wind kinetic energy transferred into the magnetosphere during the geomagnetic storm caused large Joule heating in the auroral ionosphere in both dayside and nightside of Earth. Compression of the magnetosphere by the shock/sheath caused losses of relativistic-energy electrons from the outer radiation belt at the beginning of the magnetospheric event. The equatorial ionospheric anomaly structure, characterized by a low plasma region on the geomagnetic equator and plasma enhancements on both sides (similar to +/- 10 degrees) of the equator, was significantly altered during the magnetic storm. In particular, the plasma density crests were more intense and expanded in hemispherical distribution. These variations are attributed to the prompt penetration electric fields to the equatorial ionosphere, which in turn modulated the equatorial ionospheric dynamics. These results should be important for prediction and modeling of geomagnetic storms and their impacts. The April 2023 double-peak geomagnetic storm is a classic event with a sub-Alfv & eacute;nic region located in the middle of a magnetic cloud Relativistic electrons displayed classic flux variations and dayside/nightside Joule heating was the dominant storm energy dissipation The near-equatorial ionospheric plasma responded to a prompt penetration electric field
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Dependence of Great Geomagnetic Storm (ΔSYM-H≤-200 nT) on Associated Solar Wind Parameters
    Zhao, Ming-Xian
    Le, Gui-Ming
    Li, Qi
    Liu, Gui-Ang
    Mao, Tian
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2021, 296 (04)
  • [2] Extreme Event Statistics in Dst, SYM-H, and SMR Geomagnetic Indices
    Bergin, A.
    Chapman, S. C.
    Watkins, N. W.
    Moloney, N. R.
    Gjerloev, J. W.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 21 (03):
  • [3] Properties of the Main Phases of the Super Geomagnetic Storms (ΔSYM-H ≤-250 nT) with Different Heliolongitudes
    Zhao, Ming-Xian
    Le, Gui-Ming
    Liu, Yong-Hua
    RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Properties of the Main Phases of the Super Geomagnetic Storms(ΔSYM-H ≤-250 nT) with Different Heliolongitudes
    Ming-Xian Zhao
    Gui-Ming Le
    Yong-Hua Liu
    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2023, 23 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [5] Frequency distribution model for geomagnetic SYM-H fluctuations
    Sanchez, Ewin
    Vega-Jorquera, Pedro
    ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA, 2020, 55 (04) : 555 - 566
  • [6] Frequency distribution model for geomagnetic SYM-H fluctuations
    Ewin Sánchez
    Pedro Vega-Jorquera
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2020, 55 : 555 - 566
  • [7] GEOMAGNETIC INDICES ASY-H AND SYM-H AND THEIR RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY PARAMETERS
    Makarov, G. A.
    SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2022, 8 (04): : 36 - 43
  • [8] Classifying and bounding geomagnetic storms based on the SYM-H and ASY-H indices
    Collado-Villaverde, Armando
    Munoz, Pablo
    Cid, Consuelo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (02) : 1141 - 1162
  • [9] Analysis of solar plasma parameters during intense geomagnetic storm (SYM/H<-100) in 2023
    Kumar, Pawan
    Pal, Mahender
    Singh, Sham
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2024, 179 (7-8): : 985 - 993
  • [10] High-resolution global storm index:: Dst versus SYM-H
    Wanliss, JA
    Showalter, KM
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2006, 111 (A2)