Dynamics of coupled implicit and explicit opinions

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Lin [1 ]
Wang, Xiaofan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Automat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn & Automat, Dept Automat, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Co-evolution model; Biased assimilation model; Nonlinear systems; Group discussion; POLARIZATION; CONSENSUS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111694
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a dual opinions co-evolution model based on the dual attitudes theory in social psychology, where every individual has dual opinions of an object: implicit and explicit opinions. The implicit opinions are individuals' inner evaluations affected by the experience, while the explicit opinions are external expressions of the evaluations and are influenced by public opinion. We theoretically analyze the dynamics of coupled dual opinions in an adversarial discussion scenario, in which two opposing groups participate in the discussion. We rigorously give a method to grade the degree of individual bias. When individuals have a slight bias, dual opinions reach a consensus, showing the phenomenon of acceptance. When individuals are moderately or even extremely biased, they will exhibit the phenomenon of outward compliance, that is, their publicly explicit opinions conform to public opinion, while implicit opinions will reach a persistent disagreement and even polarization. Our investigation indicates that dual opinions may not be monotone initially but eventually converge monotonically. Besides, we analyze the influence of parameters on the co-evolutionary process and results. Numerical simulations of the dual opinions formation process produce inward and outward conformity phenomena, namely acceptance and compliance. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mining explicit and implicit opinions from reviews
    Lazhar, Farek
    Yamina, Tlili-Guiassa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING MODELLING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 8 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [2] An NLP Framework for Interpreting Implicit and Explicit Opinions in Text and Dialog
    Wiebe, Jan
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI 2015), 2015, 9091
  • [3] Adapted Deffuant-Weisbuch model with implicit and explicit opinions
    Luo, Yun
    Li, Yuke
    Sun, Chudi
    Cheng, Chun
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2022, 596
  • [4] Spatially mixed implicit-explicit schemes in hydro-mechanically coupled soil dynamics
    Staubach, Patrick
    Machacek, Jan
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2024, 176
  • [5] A CONCURRENT EXPLICIT IMPLICIT ALGORITHM IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
    SOTELINO, ED
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1994, 51 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [6] Temporal dynamics of explicit and implicit moral evaluations
    Tao, Dan
    Leng, Yue
    Peng, Suhao
    Xu, Jing
    Ge, Sheng
    Deng, Huihua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 172 : 1 - 9
  • [7] Star Ratings versus Sentiment Analysis - A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Measures of Opinions
    Lak, Parisa
    Turetken, Ozgur
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 796 - 805
  • [8] Discrepancies of Implicit and Explicit Opinions Over Time-Varying Social Networks
    Liu, Qingsong
    Li, Zheng
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2024, 8 : 1979 - 1984
  • [9] Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Photoinduced Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Solvent Simulations
    Auer, Benjamin
    Soudackov, Alexander V.
    Hammes-Schiffer, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2012, 116 (26): : 7695 - 7708
  • [10] Implicit-explicit time integration in multibody dynamics
    Arnold, Martin
    Hippmann, Gerhard
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 6, PTS A-C, 2005, : 167 - 176