Identifying a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets: Implications for divorce education

被引:0
|
作者
Beckmeyer, Jonathon J. [1 ]
Russell, Luke T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Dept Family & Consumer Sci, Turner Hall Room 110,700 W Coll Ave, Norma, IL 61761 USA
关键词
divorce education; divorce resilience; family assets; parental divorce; CHILD-SUPPORT; ASSOCIATIONS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1111/fcre.12808
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Divorce education programs seek to provide parents with information about various aspects of the divorce process, its consequences, and strategies for successful adjustment. Within those broad content areas, however, there are myriad of potential promotive-, protective-, and risk-factors that programs could address. Thus, divorce education programs could benefit from further guidance about the content areas divorcing parents may find the most helpful. In the present study we aimed to describe what divorced parents felt had helped their families throughout the divorce process. We did so to promote further alignment between divorce education program content and what parents have found helpful. Specifically, we identified a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets. Our findings suggest that though a plurality of divorcing parents benefit from a wide range of legal/professional, former spouse, and personal assets, the majority rely predominately upon their own parenting skills and resources, or perceive few beneficial assets to draw on. We contend divorce educators should consider incorporating further information on developing personal parenting skills or resources, and skillfully navigating legal or therapeutic systems, to further complement existing curricula. Divorce education programs could benefit from further understanding of what divorced parents find helpful as they navigate family transitions. We identified three patterns of helpful assets: (1) Everything Helps (37.6% of sample); (2) Nothing Helps (34.2%); and (3) I Help Myself (28.2%). Across groups, the assets most likely to be seen as helpful were within parents' own control (e.g., their own parenting skills). Divorce education programs should consider expanding their focus on these individually controlled assets and skillfully navigating the legal system.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 473
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Communication technology use in post-divorce coparenting relationships: A typology and associations with post-divorce adjustment
    Russell, Luke T.
    Ferraro, Anthony J.
    Beckmeyer, Jonathon J.
    Markham, Melinda S.
    Wilkins-Clark, Renee E.
    Zimmermann, McKenzie L.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2021, 38 (12) : 3752 - 3776
  • [2] Engaging fathers in the post-divorce family
    Braver, SL
    Griffin, WA
    MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW, 2000, 29 (04): : 247 - 267
  • [3] AMBIGUITY AND CHANGE IN THE POST-DIVORCE FAMILY - TOWARDS A MODEL OF DIVORCE ADJUSTMENT
    MCPHEE, JT
    JOURNAL OF DIVORCE, 1984, 8 (02): : 1 - 15
  • [4] JOINT CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS IN THE POST-DIVORCE FAMILY
    AHRONS, CR
    JOURNAL OF DIVORCE, 1980, 3 (03): : 189 - 205
  • [5] POST-DIVORCE FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS AS MEDIATING FACTORS IN THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIVORCE FOR CHILDREN
    HESS, RD
    CAMARA, KA
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1979, 35 (04) : 79 - 96
  • [6] The post-divorce period - Family ties and vulnerability
    Donzelot, J
    ESPRIT, 1998, (3-4) : 293 - 294
  • [7] POST-DIVORCE CLINIC
    SHEFFNER, DJ
    SUAREZ, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1975, 132 (04): : 442 - 444
  • [8] The nuclear family as an ideal. A view on constructing divorce and post-divorce families
    Zartler, Ulrike
    ZEITSCHRIFTE FUR FAMILIENFORSCHUNG-JOURNAL OF FAMILY RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (01): : 67 - 84
  • [9] POST-DIVORCE FAMILY-THERAPY - SUGGESTIONS FOR PROFESSIONALS
    MORELAND, J
    SCHWEBEL, AI
    FINE, MA
    VESS, JD
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 13 (05): : 639 - 646
  • [10] Post-divorce family trajectories of men and women in Flanders
    Vanassche, Sofie
    Corijn, Martine
    Matthijs, Koen
    DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2015, 32 : 859 - 872