Patient Preferences for First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: An Application of Multidimensional Thresholding

被引:0
|
作者
Apolo, Andrea B. [1 ]
Michaels-Igbokwe, Christine [2 ]
Simon, Nicholas I. [1 ]
Benjamin, David J. [3 ]
Farrar, Mallory [4 ]
Hepp, Zsolt [4 ]
Mucha, Lisa [5 ]
Heidenreich, Sebastian [6 ]
Cutts, Katelyn [2 ]
Krucien, Nicolas [6 ]
Ramachandran, Natasha [6 ]
Gore, John L. [7 ]
机构
[1] NCI, NIH, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Evidera, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Hoag Family Canc Inst, Newport Beach, CA USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Bothell, WA USA
[5] Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL USA
[6] Evidera, London, England
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
PHASE-III TRIAL; BLADDER-CANCER; ENFORTUMAB VEDOTIN; DECISION-MAKING; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PEMBROLIZUMAB; METHOTREXATE; GEMCITABINE; VINBLASTINE;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00709-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesPatient preferences have the potential to influence the development of new treatments for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), and therefore we explored how patients with la/mUC value different attributes of first-line treatments.MethodsAn online preference survey and multidimensional thresholding (MDT) exercise were developed following a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews with physicians, patients with la/mUC, and their caregivers. Treatment attributes included two benefits (overall response rate [ORR], pain related to bladder cancer [scored 0-100; 100 being the worst pain possible]) and four treatment-related risks (peripheral neuropathy, severe side effects, mild to moderate nausea, mild to moderate skin reactions). A Dirichlet regression was used to estimate average preference weights. Marginal utility and the reduction in ORR that patients would accept in exchange for a 10-point decrease or a 10% decrease in other attributes were calculated.ResultsA total of 100 patients were recruited and self-completed the survey and MDT. Mean patient age was 64.9 years (standard deviation, 7.6), 54% were female, and 38% identified as white. All included treatment attributes had a statistically significant impact on preferences. Changes in ORR had the largest impact, followed by cancer-related pain and treatment-related risks. Patients were willing to accept an 8.4% decrease in ORR to reduce their pain level by 10 points or a 7.8% decrease in ORR to reduce the risk of peripheral neuropathy by 10%. For a 10% decrease in severe side effects, mild to moderate nausea, or skin reaction, patients would accept decreases in ORR of 5.5%, 3.7%, or 3.4%, respectively.ConclusionsOf the attributes tested, changes in ORR were most important to patients. Patients made tradeoffs between treatment attributes indicating that a lower ORR may be acceptable for an improvement in other attributes such as reduced cancer-related pain or the risk of treatment-related adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Avelumab as First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Mansinho, Andre
    Cruz, Andreia
    Marconi, Lorenzo
    Pinto, Cidalia
    Augusto, Isabel
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2023, 40 (10) : 4134 - 4150
  • [2] Avelumab as First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    André Mansinho
    Andreia Cruz
    Lorenzo Marconi
    Cidália Pinto
    Isabel Augusto
    Advances in Therapy, 2023, 40 : 4134 - 4150
  • [3] ONCOLOGISTS' PREFERENCES FOR FIRST-LINE (1L) TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED/ UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA (AUC)
    Grivas, P.
    Phani, V
    Chiu, K.
    Pawar, V
    Chang, J.
    Bharmal, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S162 - S162
  • [4] Medical oncologists' first-line treatment preferences in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
    Apolo, Andrea B.
    Cambron-Mellott, M. Janelle
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    Seal, Brian S.
    Maculaitis, Martine C.
    Bernstein, Andrew
    Epperson, Megan
    Jeffress, Mara Lisa
    Doleh, Yunes
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [5] First-Line Therapy in locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Rexer, H.
    ONKOLOGE, 2012, 18 (01): : 70 - 71
  • [6] First-Line Therapy in locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Rexer, H.
    ONKOLOGE, 2011, 17 (07): : 638 - 639
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVELUMAB AS FIRST-LINE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN FINLAND
    Karttunen, E.
    Jaaskelainen, S.
    Hervonen, P.
    Chang, J.
    Kearney, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S99 - S99
  • [8] First-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an update
    von Amsberg, Gunhild
    Retz, Margitta
    De Santis, Maria
    Niegisch, Gunter
    ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 28 (09): : 792 - 798
  • [9] Preferences for first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma among US practicing oncologists and patients
    Grivas, Petros
    Veeranki, Phani
    Chiu, Kevin
    Pawar, Vivek
    Chang, Jane
    Bharmal, Murtuza
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (05) : 369 - 383
  • [10] A prospective exploratory clinical study of penpulimab plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
    Yang, Bo
    Xiong, Qi
    Song, Qi
    Long, Yaping
    Guo, Gang
    Li, Hongzhao
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)