Impact of green marketing, greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity

被引:10
|
作者
Qayyum, Abdul [1 ]
Jamil, Raja Ahmed [2 ]
Sehar, Amnah [1 ]
机构
[1] Riphah Int Univ, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Univ Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan
关键词
Brand credibility; Brand equity; Green marketing; Greenwashing; Excessive product packaging; Green confusion; CONSUMER CONFUSION; CREDIBILITY; PERSPECTIVE; BEHAVIOR; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1108/SJME-03-2022-0032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to examine the negative effects of excessive product packaging (EPP), greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity (GBE). Furthermore, the moderating role of brand credibility in mitigating the negative effects of green marketing was investigated. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subject experiment was conducted to evaluate excessive versus minimal product packaging to test the proposed hypotheses. Data analysis was performed with SmartPLS 3.3.3, which analyzed data from 206 consumers. Findings - The results showed that EPP positively predicts greenwashing and green confusion. However, greenwashing has a negative impact on GBE. Brand credibility was also discovered to moderate the negative relationship between greenwashing and GBE, thereby reducing the negative effect of greenwashing. Research limitations/implications - The findings imply that marketing managers should understand the consumers' concerns for the environment, making product and brand strategies that promote environmental protection and sustainability. Originality/value - This study contributes to the green marketing literature by empirically validating the positive impacts of EPP on greenwashing and green confusion, as well as the negative influence of greenwashing on GBE. Furthermore, it reveals how brand credibility can reduce the harmful effects of greenwashing on GBE.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 305
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Green Marketing and its Impact on Consumer Based Brand Equity
    Sohail, Sadiq
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ICIE 2016), 2016, : 238 - 246
  • [2] The factors affecting the green brand equity of electronic products: Green marketing
    Delafrooz, Narges
    Goli, Armin
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 2 (01):
  • [3] Green Marketing and Repurchase Intention: Stewardship of Green Advertisement, Brand Awareness, Brand Equity, Green Innovativeness, and Brand Innovativeness
    Pancic, Mladen
    Serdarusic, Hrvoje
    Cucic, Drazen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [4] The impact of green marketing mix elements on green customer based brand equity in an emerging market
    Nguyen-Viet, Bang
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 15 (01) : 96 - 116
  • [5] The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust
    Yu-Shan Chen
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 93 : 307 - 319
  • [6] The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust
    Chen, Yu-Shan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 93 (02) : 307 - 319
  • [7] Green Marketing and Green Brand - The Toyota Case
    Simao, Lidia
    Lisboa, Ana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (RESIM 2016), 2017, 12 : 183 - 194
  • [8] Enhancing green brand equity through environmental reputation: The important of green brand image, green brand trust, and green brand loyalty
    Tran, Nguyen Khanh Hai
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 6 (04): : 1006 - 1017
  • [9] The Effect of Green Brand Image and Green Satisfaction on Green Brand Equity Mediated Green Trust Outpatient's
    Jannah, Nur
    Bahri, M. Irvanni
    Kismawadi, Early Ridho
    Handriana, Tanti
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2024, 25 (198): : 381 - 390
  • [10] Greenwash and Green Brand Equity
    Chen, Yu-Shan
    Tien, Wen-Pin
    Lee, Yu-I
    Tsai, Ming-Lun
    [J]. PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET 2016): TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION, 2016, : 1797 - 1803